Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34981988›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2022

What's the SCORE? Current management of symptomatic, clinically occult, radiologically evident inguinal hernias.

Surgical Trainees in East of England Research (STEER) Collaborative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Surgical Trainees in East of England Research (STEER) CollaborativeEast of England Deanery, UK- steercollaborative.co.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSymptomatic, clinically occult, radiologically evident inguinal hernias (SCORE-IH) are challenging due to diagnostic uncertainty and a lack of treatment consensus. This study explores current practice among surgeons treating SCORE-IH.

methodsA trainee-led research collaborative (STEER) disseminated a validated online survey among UK and international consultants. Collated responses were analysed to determine surgeons' experience and approach to the management of SCORE-IH.

resultsA total of 73 responses were received. Overall, 26% of respondents performed more than 100 IH repairs annually. Nearly two-thirds (62%) were unaware of SCORE-IH guidelines. Surgeons chose ultrasonography (31.5%) or ultrasonography with magnetic resonance imaging (24.6%) to manage SCORE-IH. Surgeons managed SCORE-IH conservatively or operatively in 31% and 36% of cases, respectively. Surgeons' experience and laparoscopic capacity did not correlate with their approach to SCORE-IH management.

conclusionsThere is heterogeneity in SCORE-IH management, likely due to an absence of adequate guidelines. The results highlight that further SCORE-IH research is needed to achieve consensus.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalLaparoscopySurgeonsHerniorrhaphyHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesGroinHerniaManagementOccultSurvey

Identifiers

PMID34981988
PMCPMC10335164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.