Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34981750›Full record

ArticleEuropean thyroid journal2022

Iodine supplementation: compliance and association with adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

Maria Lopes-Pereira, Anna Quialheiro, Patrício Costa, Susana Roque, Nadine Correia Santos, Margarida Correia-Neves, Ana Goios, Ivone Carvalho, Tim I M Korevaar, Laura Vilarinho and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European thyroid journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria Lopes-PereiraLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Anna QuialheiroLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Patrício CostaLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Susana RoqueLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Nadine Correia SantosLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Margarida Correia-NevesLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Ana GoiosLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Ivone CarvalhoNewborn Screening, Metabolism & Genetics Unit, National Institute of Health Dr Ricardo Jorge, Porto, Portugal.
Tim I M KorevaarAcademic Center for Thyroid Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Laura VilarinhoNewborn Screening, Metabolism & Genetics Unit, National Institute of Health Dr Ricardo Jorge, Porto, Portugal.
Joana Almeida PalhaLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Over 1.9 billion people worldwide are living in areas estimated to be iodine insufficient. Strategies for iodine supplementation include campaigns targeting vulnerable groups, such as women in pre-conception, pregnancy and lactation. Portuguese women of childbearing age and pregnant women were shown to be mildly-to-moderately iodine deficient. As a response, in 2013, the National Health Authority (NHA) issued a recommendation that all women considering pregnancy, pregnant or breastfeeding, take a daily supplement of 150-200 μg iodine. This study explored how the iodine supplementation recommendation has been fulfilled among pregnant and lactating women in Portugal, and whether the reported iodine supplements intake impacted on adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Design and methods: Observational retrospective study on pregnant women who delivered or had a fetal loss in the Braga Hospital and had their pregnancies followed in Family Health Units. Results: The use of iodine supplements increased from 25% before the recommendation to 81% after the recommendation. This was mostly due to an increase in the use of supplements containing iodine only. Iodine supplementation was protective for the number of adverse obstetric outcomes (odds ratio (OR) = 0.791, P = 0.018) and for neonatal morbidities (OR = 0.528, P = 0.024) after controlling for relevant confounding variables. Conclusion: The recommendation seems to have succeeded in implementing iodine supplementation during pregnancy. National prospective studies are now needed to evaluate the impact of iodine supplementation on maternal thyroid homeostasis and offspring psychomotor development and on whether the time of the beginning of iodine supplementation (how early during preconception or pregnancy) is relevant to consider.

Indexed as

iodineneonatal outcomesnewbornobstetric outcomespregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34981750
PMCPMC9142800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.