ArticleMedical education2022
Patient involvement in assessment of postgraduate medical learners: A scoping review.
Article in Medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Public participation in healthcare students' education: An umbrella review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Pooled it
- Conceptualising and assessing interdependent clinical performances: Early insights from emergency medicine and paediatric faculty.Medical education · 2026Article
- Patients' Voices and the Assessment of Medical Trainees: A Discourse Analysis.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Review
- Active Patient Involvement in Healthcare Education in the Global South: Perspectives From Pakistan.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Patient Perspectives in Optometry Clinical Exams.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Perspectives on Involving Patients in the Teaching and Assessment of Entrustable Professional Activities in Competence by Design.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Clinical education: nursing students' experiences with multisource feedback using a digital assessment instrument in the emergency medical Service - a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Exploring the concepts of consumer feedback systems for occupational therapy student learning during practice placements: A scoping review.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2024Article
- Real Patient Participation in Workplace-Based Assessment of Health Professional Trainees: A Scoping Review.Evaluation & the health professions · 2024Article
- Linking assessment to real life practice - comparing work based assessments and objective structured clinical examinations using mystery shopping.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024Article
- Fostering the development of non-technical competencies in medical learners through patient engagement: a rapid review.Canadian medical education journal · 2023Review
- Patient references in the 2005 and 2015 CanMEDS frameworks.Canadian medical education journal · 2023Article
- Australian occupational therapists' perspectives of consumers authentically contributing to student learning during practice placements: 'It just makes sense!' but 'we need a process'.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2022Article
- Patient involvement in assessment: How useful is it?Medical education · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextCompetency-based assessment of learners may benefit from a more holistic, inclusive, approach for determining readiness for unsupervised practice. However, despite movements towards greater patient partnership in health care generally, inclusion of patients in postgraduate medical learners' assessment is largely absent.
methodsWe conducted a scoping review to map the nature, extent and range of literature examining the inclusion (or exclusion) of patients within the assessment of postgraduate medical learners. Guided by Arskey and O'Malley's framework and informed by Levac et al. and Thomas et al., we searched two databases (MEDLINE® and Embase®) from inception until February 2021 using subheadings related to assessment, patients and postgraduate learners. Data analysis examined characteristics regarding the nature and factor influencing patient involvement in assessment.
resultsWe identified 41 papers spanning four decades. Some literature suggests patients are willing to be engaged in assessment, however choose not to engage when, for example, language barriers may exist. When stratified by specialty or clinical setting, the influence of factors such as gender, race, ethnicity or medical condition seems to remain consistent. Patients may participate in assessment as a stand-alone group or part of a multi-source feedback process. Patients generally provided high ratings but commented on the observed professional behaviours and communication skills in comparison with physicians who focused on medical expertise.
conclusionFactors that influence patient involvement in assessment are multifactorial including patients' willingness themselves, language and reading-comprehension challenges and available resources for training programmes to facilitate the integration of patient assessments. These barriers however are not insurmountable. While understudied, research examining patient involvement in assessment is increasing; however, our review suggests that the extent which the unique insights will be taken up in postgraduate medical education may be dependent on assessment systems readiness and, in particular, physician readiness to partner with patients in this way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.