Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34981371›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

PPE pollution in the terrestrial and aquatic environment of the Chittagong city area associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and concomitant health implications.

Md Jainal Abedin, Mayeen Uddin Khandaker, Md Ripaj Uddin, Md Rezaul Karim, M Shahab Uddin Ahamad, Md Ariful Islam, Abu Mohammad Arif, Abdelmoneim Sulieman, Abubakr M Idris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Effects of UV radiation on natural and synthetic materials.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Md Jainal AbedinFaculty of Public Health, Thammasat University, Bangkok, 10200, Thailand.
Mayeen Uddin KhandakerCentre for Applied Physics and Radiation Technologies, School of Engineering and Technology, Sunway University, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia. mu_khandaker@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3772-294X
Md Ripaj UddinInstitute of National Analytical Research and Service (INARS), BCSIR, Dhanmondi, Dhaka, 1205, Bangladesh.
Md Rezaul KarimDepartment of Chemistry, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Chattogram, 4349, Bangladesh.
M Shahab Uddin AhamadDepartment of Pathology, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram, 4302, Bangladesh.
Md Ariful IslamDepartment of Chemistry, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Chattogram, 4349, Bangladesh.
Abu Mohammad ArifOne Health Institute, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram, 4225, Bangladesh.
Abdelmoneim SuliemanDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 422, Alkharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Abubakr M IdrisDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4038-4769

Funding

King Khalid University R.G.P.2/33/42
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study focuses on the indiscriminate disposal of personal protective equipment (PPEs) and resulting environmental contamination during the 3rd wave of COVID-19-driven global pandemic in the Chittagong metropolitan area, Bangladesh. Because of the very high rate of infection by the delta variant of this virus, the use of PPEs by the public is increased significantly to protect the ingestion/inhalation of respiratory droplets in the air. However, it is a matter of solicitude that general people throw away the PPEs to the dwelling environment unconsciously. With the increase of inappropriate disposal of PPEs (i.e., mostly the disposable face masks made from plastic microfibers), the possibility of transmission of the virus to the general public cannot be neglected completely. This is because this virus can survive for several days on the inanimate matter like plastics and fibers. At the same time, the result of environmental contamination by microplastic/microfiber has been widespread which eventually creates the worst impact on ecosystems and organisms. The present results may help to increase public perception of the use and subsequent disposal of PPEs, especially the face masks.

Indexed as

COVID-19Personal Protective EquipmentBangladeshEcosystemHumansPandemicsPlasticsSARS-CoV-2PlasticsCOVID-19DisposalEnvironmental contaminationPandemicPPEs

Identifiers

PMID34981371
PMCPMC8723821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.