Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34981347›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

Reducing Sedative-Hypnotics Among Hospitalized Patients: a Multi-centered Study.

Christine Soong, Cheryl Ethier, Yuna Lee, Dalia Othman, Lisa Burry, Peter E Wu, Karen A Ng, John Matelski, Barbara Liu

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christine SoongDivisions of General Internal Medicine and Hospital Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada. christine.soong@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1397-9671
Cheryl EthierDivisions of General Internal Medicine and Hospital Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yuna LeeDivision of General Internal Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Dalia OthmanDivisions of General Internal Medicine and Hospital Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lisa BurryDivisions of General Internal Medicine and Hospital Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter E WuDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Karen A NgDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
John MatelskiBiostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Barbara LiuDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSedative-hypnotics are frequently prescribed for insomnia in hospital but are associated with preventable harms. OBJECTIVE, DESIGN, AND

participantsWe aimed to examine whether a sedative-hypnotic reduction quality improvement bundle decreases the rate of sedative-hypnotic use among hospitalized patients, who were previously naïve to sedative-hypnotics. This interrupted time series study occurred between May 2016 and January 2019. Control data for 1 year prior to implementation and intervention data for at least 16 months were collected. The study occurred on 7 inpatient wards (general medicine, cardiology, nephrology, general surgery, and cardiovascular surgery wards) across 5 teaching hospitals in Toronto, Canada.

interventionParticipating wards implemented a sedative-hypnotic reduction bundle (i.e., order set changes, audit-feedback, pharmacist-enabled medication reviews, sleep hygiene, daily sleep huddles, and staff/patient/family education) aimed to reduce in-hospital sedative-hypnotic initiation for insomnia in patients who were previously naïve to sedative-hypnotics. Each inpatient ward adapted the bundle prior to sustaining the intervention for a minimum of 16 months. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of sedative-hypnotic-naïve inpatients newly prescribed a sedative-hypnotic for sleep in hospital. Secondary measures include prescribing rates of other sedating medications, fall rates, length of stay, and mortality. KEY

resultsWe included 8,970 patient discharges in the control period and 10,120 in the intervention period. Adjusted sedative-hypnotic prescriptions among naïve patients decreased from 15.48% (95% CI: 6.09-19.42) to 9.08% (p<0.001) (adjusted OR 0.814; 95% CI: 0.667-0.993, p=0.042). Unchanged secondary outcomes included mortality (adjusted OR 1.089; 95% CI: 0.786-1.508, p=0.608), falls (adjusted rate ratio 0.819; 95% CI: 0.625-1.073, p=0.148), or other sedating drug prescriptions (adjusted OR 1.046; 95% CI: 0.873-1.252, p=0.627).

conclusionsA sedative-hypnotic reduction quality improvement bundle implemented across 5 hospitals was associated with a sustained reduction in sedative-hypnotic prescriptions.

Indexed as

Sleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersDrug PrescriptionsHumansHypnotics and SedativesInpatientsSleepHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID34981347
PMCPMC9360352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.