ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2022
Prospective evaluation of sleep disturbances in chronic pancreatitis and its impact on quality of life: a pilot study.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies for chronic pancreatitis pain: a narrative review.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) have poor quality of life (QOL). Sleep disorders affect QOL when associated with chronic pain and opioid use. Hence patients with CP may have unrecognized sleep disturbances.
aimsThe aim of the study was to evaluate sleep disturbances in CP and its impact on QOL.
methodsEstablished CP patients were prospectively enrolled after exclusion of patients with co-morbidities known to negatively affect sleep and QOL. Three questionnaires were used to identify sleep disturbances, PROMISv1SF8, Insomnia Severity Index, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and one for restless leg syndrome (RLS). PANQOLI and SF12 questionnaires were used to evaluate QOL. Two blinded sleep pulmonologists evaluated the responses. QOL assessments were then analyzed in patients with and without sleep disturbances.
resultsOf 89 patients, 48 met exclusion criteria, 41 were eligible, and 28 completed the study. Twenty patients (71%) had sleep disturbances with significantly worse scores across all 3 sleep questionnaires and also had lower scores on both PANQOLI (50 vs 76, p = 0.002) and SF-12 (physical component 29.3 vs 53.9, p < 0.001; mental component 36.4 vs 46.1, p = 0.03). Eleven patients (39%) had RLS and sleep disturbances.
conclusionIn patients with established CP there was a high prevalence of sleep disturbances and RLS with worse QOL representing a potential therapeutic target to improve QOL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.