ReviewHealth care management science2022
Bibliometric analysis of cancer care operations management: current status, developments, and future directions.
Review in Health care management science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Optimizing patient flow logistics: strategic challenges, tactical solutions, and future directions.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Current status and trends of machine learning applied in clinical research of gastric cancer from 2004 to 2023: global bibliometric and visual analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Advancements and challenges in robotic surgery: A holistic examination of operational dynamics and future directions.Surgery in practice and science · 2025Review
- Exploring the Landscape of Operating Room Scheduling: A Bibliometric Analysis of Recent Advancements and Future Prospects.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2025Review
- Bibliometric analysis of RNA vaccines for cancer.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Advances in gut microbiome in metabonomics perspective: based on bibliometrics methods and visualization analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Thirty-year survey of bibliometrics used in the research literature of pain: Analysis, evolution, and pitfalls.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Clustering and Stochastic Simulation Optimization for Outpatient Chemotherapy Appointment Planning and Scheduling.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Mapping intellectual structures and research hotspots in the application of artificial intelligence in cancer: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Around the world, cancer care services are facing many operational challenges. Operations management research can provide important solutions to these challenges, from screening and diagnosis to treatment. In recent years, the growth in the number of papers published on cancer care operations management (CCOM) indicates that development has been fast. Within this context, the objective of this research was to understand the evolution of CCOM through a comprehensive study and an up-to-date bibliometric analysis of the literature. To achieve this aim, the Web of Science Core Collection database was used as the source of bibliographic records. The data-mining and quantitative tools in the software Biblioshiny were used to analyze CCOM articles published from 2010 to 2021. First, a historical analysis described CCOM research, the sources, and the subfields. Second, an analysis of keywords highlighted the significant developments in this field. Third, an analysis of research themes identified three main directions for future research in CCOM, which has 11 evolutionary paths. Finally, this paper discussed the gaps in CCOM research and the areas that require further investigation and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34981268What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.