Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34981257›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2022

Sex and Relationships Pre- and Early- COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students.

Debby Herbenick, Devon J Hensel, Heather Eastman-Mueller, Jonathon Beckmeyer, Tsung-Chieh Fu, Lucia Guerra-Reyes, Molly Rosenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Associations between Relationship Status, Anxiety, Sexual Function, and Sexual Satisfaction in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Debby HerbenickThe Center for Sexual Health Promotion, Indiana University School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. debby@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0352-2248
Devon J HenselThe Center for Sexual Health Promotion, Indiana University School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Heather Eastman-MuellerThe Center for Sexual Health Promotion, Indiana University School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Jonathon BeckmeyerThe Center for Sexual Health Promotion, Indiana University School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Tsung-Chieh FuThe Center for Sexual Health Promotion, Indiana University School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Lucia Guerra-ReyesThe Center for Sexual Health Promotion, Indiana University School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Molly RosenbergThe Center for Sexual Health Promotion, Indiana University School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, most U.S. colleges closed their campuses-including residence halls-causing significant disruption to students' lives. Two waves of data were collected from undergraduate students enrolled at a large U.S. Midwestern university: Wave 1 was a confidential online survey of 4989 randomly sampled undergraduate students collected in January/February 2020; Wave 2 was collected in April/May 2020 following campus closure. Our research aimed to: (1) assess how the COVID-19 related campus closure affected college students' romantic/sexual relationships, (2) examine students' past month sexual behaviors prior to the pandemic in comparison with their sexual behaviors during campus closure, and (3) compare participants' pre-pandemic event-level sexual behaviors with those occurring during campus closure. Of 2137 participants who completed both waves (49.8% women, mean age = 20.9), 2.6% were living at home in Wave 1 compared to 71.0% at Wave 2. Of those in relationships, 14.5% experienced a breakup and 25.3% stayed in their relationship but returned home to different cities. There were no statistically significant differences in participants' prior month reports of solo masturbation or sending/receiving nude/sexy images between Waves 1 and 2; however, participation in oral, vaginal, and anal sex significantly decreased across waves. Examining participants' most recent sexual events, Wave 2 sex more often occurred with a cohabiting or relationship partner and was rated as more wanted, emotionally intimate, and orgasmic. Implications for sexual health professionals are discussed.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdultFemaleHumansMaleSampling StudiesSARS-CoV-2Sexual BehaviorStudentsUniversitiesYoung AdultCollege studentsCoronavirusCOVID-19Living arrangementsRelationshipsSexual behavior

Identifiers

PMID34981257
PMCPMC8722645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.