Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34981246›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2022

Improving shared decision-making for osteoporosis pharmacologic therapy in nursing homes: a qualitative analysis.

Cathleen S Colón-Emeric, Emily J Hecker, Eleanor McConnell, Laurie Herndon, Milta Little, Tingzhong Xue, Sarah Berry

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deprescribing bisphosphonates for older adults with dementia: perspectives of caregivers.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cathleen S Colón-EmericDuke University, Box 3003 DUMC, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. colon001@mc.duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7681-8624
Emily J HeckerDuke University, Box 3003 DUMC, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Eleanor McConnellDuke University, Box 3003 DUMC, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Laurie HerndonHebrew Center for Senior Life, Boston, MA, USA.
Milta LittleDuke University, Box 3003 DUMC, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Tingzhong XueDuke University, Box 3003 DUMC, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Sarah BerryHebrew Center for Senior Life, Boston, MA, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USHebrew College · USDuke University · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · US

Funding

Nursing Home Prevention of Injury in Dementia (NH PRIDE)R01AG062492 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI BERRY, SARAH DYER, COLON-EMERIC, CATHLEEN S · 2019 to 2021
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS AG062492-01NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decisions on whether to use pharmacologic osteoporosis therapy in skilled nursing facility residents are complex and require shared decision-making. Residents, proxies, and staff desire individualized fracture risk estimates that consider advanced age, dementia, and mobility. They want options for reducing administration burden, monitoring instructions, and periodic reassessment of risk vs. benefit. PURPOSE: Decisions about pharmacologic osteoporosis treatment in nursing home (NH) residents with advanced age and multimorbidity are complex and should occur using shared decision-making. Our objective was to identify processes and tools to improve shared decision-making about pharmacologic osteoporosis treatment in NHs.

methodsQualitative analysis of data collected in three NHs from residents at high fracture risk, their proxies, nursing assistants, nurses, and one nurse practitioner (n = 28). Interviews explored participants' stories, attitudes, and experiences with oral osteoporosis medication management. Framework analysis was used to identify barriers to shared decision-making regarding osteoporosis treatment in this setting.

resultsParticipants wanted individualized fracture risk estimates that consider immobility, advanced age, and comorbid dementia. Residents and proxies expected nursing staff to be involved in the decision-making; nursing staff wished to be informed on the relative risks vs. benefits of medications and given monitoring instructions. Two important competing demands to address during the shared decision-making process were burdensome administration requirements and polypharmacy. Participants wanted to reassess pharmacologic treatment appropriateness over time as clinical status or goals of care change.

conclusionsShared decision-making using strategies and tools identified in this analysis may move osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment in NHs and for other older adults with multimorbidity from inappropriate inertia to appropriate prescribing or appropriate inaction.

Indexed as

DementiaOsteoporosisAgedHumansNursing HomesMedical decision-makingOsteoporosisPharmacotherapySkilled nursing facilities

Identifiers

PMID34981246
PMCPMC9479090
OpenAlexW4206581683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.