Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34981179›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2022

Investigating individual differences in opioid-taking and opioid-seeking behavior in male rats.

Stephen E Chang, Lauren D Krueger, Shelly B Flagel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen E ChangMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Lauren D KruegerUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Shelly B FlagelMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. sflagel@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Dynamic control of cue-driven behavior via the paraventricular thalamic nucleusR01DA038599 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FLAGEL, SHELLY BETH · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA038599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleUnderstanding the behavioral and neurobiological factors that render some individuals more susceptible than others to opioid addiction will be critical in combatting the opioid crisis.

objectiveThe purpose of the current study was to determine if behavioral traits associated with an increased likelihood to take and seek cocaine are the same traits that render one more susceptible to opioid-taking and opioid-seeking behavior. Individual differences in the acquisition of remifentanil self-administration and subsequent cue-induced reinstatement of remifentanil-seeking behavior were investigated using two animal models: the high-responder (HR)/low-responder (LR) and sign-tracker (ST)/goal-tracker (GT) models. Relative to LR rats, HR rats show increased novelty-induced locomotion or "sensation-seeking" behavior, and are more likely to acquire cocaine-taking behavior and do so at a faster rate. Relative to GT rats, ST rats attribute greater incentive motivational value to reward cues and are more likely to exhibit reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior.

resultsIn contrast to previous work using cocaine, we did not observe individual differences with respect to the acquisition of remifentanil self-administration- or cue-induced reinstatement of remifentanil-seeking behavior within the context of either the HR/LR or ST/GT model. Thus, neither the sensation-seeking trait nor the propensity to attribute incentive motivational value to reward cues predicts remifentanil-taking or remifentanil-seeking behavior.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that different traits may confer the initiation of opioid- vs. cocaine-taking behavior, and the propensity to relapse to opioid- vs. cocaine-seeking. Additional studies are needed to identify which neurobehavioral constructs confer liability to opioid use and relapse.

Indexed as

CocaineCocaine-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsCuesDrug-Seeking BehaviorExtinction, PsychologicalIndividualityMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecurrenceRemifentanilSelf AdministrationAnalgesics, OpioidCocaineRemifentanilAddictionIncentive MotivationOpioidsRelapse

Identifiers

PMID34981179
OpenAlexW4205346167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.