Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34981001›Full record

ArticleJournal of advances in medical education & professionalism2022

Are Online Synchronous Team-Based-Learning (TBL) pedagogy effective?: Perspectives from a study on medical students in Oman.

Mohan B Sannathimmappa, Vinod Nambiar, Rajeev Aravindakshan, Anil Kumar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparing Student Performance in Emergency Remote and Face-to-Face Collaborative Learning Courses.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohan B SannathimmappaCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Microbiology, National University of Science and Technology, Sohar Campus, Sultanate of Oman, Oman.
Vinod NambiarCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Microbiology, National University of Science and Technology, Sohar Campus, Sultanate of Oman, Oman.
Rajeev AravindakshanDepartment of community medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Anil KumarDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, National University of Science and Technology, Sohar Campus, Oman.
Sohar University · OMAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INNational University of Science and Technology · ZW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTeam-based learning (TBL) is a highly structured, instructive, and student-focused pedagogy used by medical educators to foster the students' learning. The present study aimed to qualitatively explore the students' perception of the effectiveness of online synchronous TBL pedagogical strategy in promoting learning outcomes.

methodsA cross-over interventional study was conducted on MD4 year medical students, using four modified TBL sessions on common immunological diseases on four different dates. 139 participants were divided into 4 groups [35 each in A, B, C, & 34 in D]. For TBL session 1, Group A and group B were the study and control groups, respectively. For the second session on different topics, the groups were reversed with group B and group A as the study and control groups, respectively. The same was followed for groups C and D. The means and standard deviations of the pre-test and post-test scores were compared after calculating the improvement in scores from pre- to post-tests. Repeated measures ANOVA suitably coded in SPSS for cross-over design was used to find out confounding by sequence of interventions with a p-value of <0.05 signifying the significance.  Students' feedback on online TBL sessions was collected through a predesigned questionnaire on a 3-point Likert scale. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 and expressed as number and percentage.

resultsThe post-test scores of the students who participated in the TBL session were significantly higher when compared to the self-study (SS) arm. The overall improvement in scores was 4.98 (1.4) in TBL group, whereas in the SS arm it was only 2.29 (1.51). The new method was found far superior to the self-study method regardless of being applied before or after the comparison mode of self-study (P<0.0001). The scores of the self-study was marginally better when offered first rather than after a TBL session, indicating the negative effect of cross-over on SS mode (P=0.024). The overall response of our students toward the effectiveness of online TBL pedagogy was overwhelmingly positive in terms of an opinion survey which had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.932. The majority (>80%) perceived TBL as an enjoyable active session that promoted their active participation and engagement through student-led discussions. Many stated that TBL enhanced their critical thinking, problem-solving ability, communication skills, and knowledge.

conclusionTBL is an instructive and highly structured teaching-learning strategy, welcomed by the majority of our participants. Online TBL sessions are effective in fostering the students' learning and can be used confidently when needed.

Indexed as

Active learningCognitionImmunologyMedical education

Identifiers

PMID34981001
PMCPMC8720151
OpenAlexW4206529350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.