Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34980942›Full record

ArticleFood control2022

Kitchen layouts and consumers' food hygiene practices: Ergonomics versus safety.

Octavian Augustin Mihalache, Trond Møretrø, Daniela Borda, Loredana Dumitraşcu, Corina Neagu, Christophe Nguyen-The, Isabelle Maître, Pierrine Didier, Paula Teixeira, Luis Orlando Lopes Junqueira and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of Hygiene Practice for ReducingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sustainable or Not? Insights on the Consumption of Animal Products in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Octavian Augustin MihalacheDunarea de Jos University of Galati, Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Domnească Street 111, 800201, Galati, Romania.
Trond MøretrøNofima, Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Osloveien 1, N-1430, Ås, Norway.
Daniela BordaDunarea de Jos University of Galati, Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Domnească Street 111, 800201, Galati, Romania.
Loredana DumitraşcuDunarea de Jos University of Galati, Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Domnească Street 111, 800201, Galati, Romania.
Corina NeaguDunarea de Jos University of Galati, Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Domnească Street 111, 800201, Galati, Romania.
Christophe Nguyen-TheINRAE, Avignon Université, UMR SQPOV, 84000, Avignon, France.
Isabelle MaîtreUSC1422 GRAPPE, Ecole Supérieure d'Agricultures (ESA), INRAE, SFR 4207 QUASAV, 55 Rue Rabelais, BP 30748, 49007, Angers Cedex, France.
Pierrine DidierINRAE, Avignon Université, UMR SQPOV, 84000, Avignon, France.
Paula TeixeiraUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina - Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005, Porto, Portugal.
Luis Orlando Lopes JunqueiraInstituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Professor Aníbal de Bettencourt 9, 1600-189, Lisboa, Portugal.
Monica TruningerInstituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Professor Aníbal de Bettencourt 9, 1600-189, Lisboa, Portugal.
Tekla IzsóNational Food Chain Safety Office, Keleti Károly u. 24, H-1024, Budapest, Hungary.
Gyula KaszaNational Food Chain Safety Office, Keleti Károly u. 24, H-1024, Budapest, Hungary.
Silje Elisabeth SkulandConsumption Research Norway (SIFO) and Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Solveig LangsrudNofima, Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Osloveien 1, N-1430, Ås, Norway.
Anca Ioana NicolauDunarea de Jos University of Galati, Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Domnească Street 111, 800201, Galati, Romania.
"Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati · RONational Food Chain Safety Office · HUNofima · NOUniversité d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse · FRUniversity of Lisbon · PTInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FROsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOUniversidade Católica Portuguesa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our paper emphasizes the importance of the kitchen layout in facilitating consumers' food hygiene practices. A significant correlation was found between the sink placement (inside or outside the kitchen) and hygienic practices during food handling based on a survey performed on consumers from ten European countries, indicating that those who had the sink in the kitchen were more likely to perform proper hygiene practices than those who have not. The self-reported practices were supported by observed practices in 64 households from five European countries. The observational study combined with the examination of kitchen layouts revealed that the kitchen work triangle with its apexes represented by the kitchen sink, cooking stove and refrigerator, which is recommended for ergonomic reasons by architects and designers, did not necessarily support food hygiene practices in kitchens. Cross-contamination events were associated with the sink - countertop distances longer than 1 m. Based on this, a new kitchen triangle with its apexes represented by the kitchen sink, working place (usually countertop) and cooking stove, with the distance between the sink and the working place less than 1 m is proposed to be used as norm in kitchen designs for combining ergonomics with safety. This triangle is proposedly named the

Indexed as

Cross-contaminationDesignFood safety triangleHand washingKitchen work triangleSink

Identifiers

PMID34980942
PMCPMC8474550
OpenAlexW3185589739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.