Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34980803›Full record

ArticleMicrobes and environments2022

Differentiation of the Pea Wilt Pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi from Other Isolates of Fusarium Species by PCR.

Shunsuke Kotera, Masashi Hishiike, Hiroki Saito, Ken Komatsu, Tsutomu Arie

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbes and environments, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inhibitory Effect ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shunsuke KoteraUnited Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (TUAT).
Masashi HishiikeWakayama Agricultural Experiment Station.
Hiroki SaitoInstitute of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (TUAT).
Ken KomatsuUnited Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (TUAT).
Tsutomu ArieUnited Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (TUAT).
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology · JPWakayama Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pea wilt disease, caused by the soilborne and seedborne fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi (Fop), first appeared in Japan in 2002. We herein investigated the molecular characteristics of 16 Fop isolates sampled from multiple locations and at different times in Japan. The 16 isolates were divided into three clades in molecular phylogenic ana-lyses based on both the TEF1α gene and the rDNA-IGS region. All of the Fop isolates harbored a PDA1 gene, which encodes the cytochrome P450 pisatin demethylase (Pda1), and also carried one or both of the SIX6 and SIX13 genes, which encode secreted in xylem (Six) proteins. Other forms of F. oxysporum and other species of Fusarium did not carry these sets of genes. Based on these results, a PCR method was developed to identify Fop and differentiate it from other forms and non-pathogenic isolates of Fusarium spp. We also demonstrated that the PCR method effectively detected Fop in infected pea plants and infested soils.

Indexed as

FusariumPisum sativumPlant DiseasesPolymerase Chain ReactionVirulencedetectionpisatin demethylase gene (PDA1)secreted in xylem genes (SIXs)soilborne pathogen

Identifiers

PMID34980803
PMCPMC8958301
OpenAlexW4205355086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.