Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34980685›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2022

On-demand Versus Continuous Maintenance Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease With Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Seung Joo Kang, Hye-Kyung Jung, Chung Hyun Tae, Seung Young Kim, Kwang Jae Lee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07707011 (Potassium Competitive Acid Blocker), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07707011 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Potassium Competitive Acid Blocker (PCAB) Test-Guided vs Physiologic Test-Guided Treatment in Patients With Typical Reflux Symptoms: A Randomized Non-inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsGERD, Acid Reflux, TreatmentArmsPCAB-test guided
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guidelines on optimizing the use of proton pump inhibitors: PPI stewardship.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [Drug Therapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Seung Joo KangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea.
Hye-Kyung JungDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chung Hyun TaeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Young KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
Kwang Jae LeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Ewha Womans University · KRAjou University · KRKorea University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsLong-term maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is commonly used to prevent relapse of reflux symptoms; however, due to concerns about safety of long-term proton pump inhibitors (PPI) use, on-demand therapy is recommended as a longterm treatment modality. We compared the efficacy of on-demand and continuous PPI therapy for maintenance treatment of patients with GERD using meta-analysis.

methodsCore electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing on-demand and continuous therapy in GERD patients. The primary outcome was treatment failure of maintenance therapy, and the secondary outcomes included symptomatic relief, patient satisfaction, and amount of PPI use.

resultsOverall, 11 studies were selected in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Compared with continuous PPI therapy, on-demand therapy showed similar outcomes for treatment failure (risk ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-2.07), particularly in the non-erosive esophageal reflux disease and mild erosive reflux disease group (risk ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.39-5.63). In studies including severe esophagitis patients, continuous PPI maintenance treatment was more effective (β, 0.127 [95% CI, 0.066-0.188];

conclusionsOn-demand PPI therapy shows comparable efficacy to the continuous maintenance treatment in the non-erosive esophageal reflux disease and mild erosive reflux disease group, and can remarkably reduce the amount of PPI use. Therefore, on-demand therapy may be preferentially recommended in the maintenance treatment of GERD unaccompanied by severe esophagitis.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal refluxMaintenanceProton pump inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34980685
PMCPMC8748841
OpenAlexW4206464441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.