Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34980626›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Danish validation of the Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ) and findings from a population health survey: a mixed-methods study.

Marie Hauge Pedersen, Polly Duncan, Mathias Lasgaard, Karina Friis, Chris Salisbury, Finn Breinholt Larsen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06402409 (Workpackage 1), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06402409 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Workpackage 1: Baseline Prevalence and Implications of Multimorbidity for the Management of Spinal Pain Workpackage 2: The Influence of Multimorbidity Treatment Burden on Long-term Prognosis of Individuals With Spinal Pain

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorJacob Christiansen GandløseRan2024 to 2026Enrolled2,000ConditionsBack Pain, Neck Pain, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marie Hauge PedersenPublic Health and Health Services Research, DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark marie.pedersen@rm.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-8472-0555
Polly DuncanCentre for Academic Primary Care, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2244-3254
Mathias LasgaardPublic Health and Health Services Research, DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.
Karina FriisPublic Health and Health Services Research, DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.
Chris SalisburyCentre for Academic Primary Care, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4378-3960
Finn Breinholt LarsenPublic Health and Health Services Research, DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6848-123X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo validate the Danish Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ) and obtain a population-based evaluation of treatment burden.

designMixed-methods.

settingDanish population-based survey.

participantsTranslation by professional translators and an expert group. The scale was tested by 13 407 participants (aged ≥25 years) in treatment. MEASURES: The 10-item MTBQ was translated into Danish using forward-backward translation and used in a large population health survey. A global MTBQ score was calculated and factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha assessed dimensional structure and internal consistency reliability, respectively. Spearman's rank correlations between global MTBQ scores and scores of self-rated health, health-related quality of life and the number of long-term conditions, respectively, assessed construct validity. MTBQ scores were grouped into four categories (no, low, medium, high burden) to assess interpretability and population-based evaluation of treatment burden.

resultsThe scale showed high internal consistency (α=0.87), positive skewness and large floor effects. Factor analysis supported a one-dimensional structure of the scale with a three-dimensional structure as a less parsimonious alternative. The MTBQ score was negatively associated with self-rated health (r

conclusionThe Danish MTBQ is a valid measure of treatment burden with good construct validity and high internal reliability. This is the first study to explore treatment burden at a population level and provides important evidence to policy makers and clinicians about sociodemographic groups at risk of higher treatment burden.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityPopulation HealthAdultDenmarkFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesepidemiologyhealth services administration & managementpublic healthstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID34980626
PMCPMC8724706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.