Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34980600›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Predictive and Therapeutic Implications of a Novel PLCγ1/SHP2-Driven Mechanism of Cetuximab Resistance in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Raquel Cruz-Duarte, Cátia Rebelo de Almeida, Magda Negrão, Afonso Fernandes, Paula Borralho, Daniel Sobral, Lina M Gallego-Paez, Daniel Machado, João Gramaça, José Vílchez and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Tyrosine phosphataseFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  12. EFR3A: a new raft domain organizing protein?Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Raquel Cruz-DuarteInstituto de Medicina Molecular - João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2047-2369
Cátia Rebelo de AlmeidaChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Magda NegrãoChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Afonso FernandesInstituto de Medicina Molecular - João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Paula BorralhoInstitute of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Daniel SobralUniversidade Nova Lisboa, UCIBIO, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal.
Lina M Gallego-PaezBioMed X Institute (GmbH), Im Neuenheimer Feld 583, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel MachadoOncology Division, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro-Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9727-3907
João GramaçaOncology Division, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro-Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal.
José VílchezOncology Division, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro-Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal.
Ana T XavierOncology Division, Centro Hospitalar Barreiro-Montijo, Barreiro, Portugal.
Miguel Godinho FerreiraChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8363-7183
Ana R MirandaHemato-Oncologia Division, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal.
Helder MansinhoHemato-Oncologia Division, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6872-0675
Maria J BritoPathology Division, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal.
Teresa R PachecoInstituto de Medicina Molecular - João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Catarina AbreuOncology Division, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3558-3966
Ana Lucia-CostaOncology Division, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.
André MansinhoInstituto de Medicina Molecular - João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8771-0838
Rita FiorChampalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Luís CostaInstituto de Medicina Molecular - João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4782-7318
Marta MartinsInstituto de Medicina Molecular - João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0429-9380
University of Lisbon · PTCentro De Medicina Veterinária Anjos De Assis · PTChampalimaud Foundation · PTHospital Garcia de Orta · PTCentro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte · PTBioMed X Institute · DEUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Technologia SFRH/BD/139138/2018Investigador FCT- Fundação para a Ciência e Technologia IF/00409/2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCetuximab is an EGFR-targeted therapy approved for the treatment of RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, about 60% of these patients show innate resistance to cetuximab. To increase cetuximab efficacy, it is crucial to successfully identify responder patients, as well as to develop new therapeutic approaches to overcome cetuximab resistance. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe evaluated the value of EGFR effector phospholipase C gamma 1 (PLCγ1) in predicting cetuximab responses, by analyzing progression-free survival (PFS) of a multicentric retrospective cohort of 94 treated patients with mCRC (log-rank test and Cox regression model). Furthermore, we used in vitro and zebrafish xenotransplant models to identify and target the mechanism behind PLCγ1-mediated resistance to cetuximab.

resultsIn this study, levels of PLCγ1 were found increased in RAS WT tumors and were able to predict cetuximab responses in clinical samples and in vitro and in vivo models. Mechanistically, PLCγ1 expression was found to bypass cetuximab-dependent EGFR inhibition by activating ERK and AKT pathways. This novel resistance mechanism involves a noncatalytic role of PLCγ1 SH2 tandem domains in the propagation of downstream signaling via SH2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP2). Accordingly, SHP2 inhibition sensitizes PLCγ1-resistant cells to cetuximab.

conclusionsOur discoveries reveal the potential of PLCγ1 as a predictive biomarker for cetuximab responses and suggest an alternative therapeutic approach to circumvent PLCγ1-mediated resistance to cetuximab in patients with RAS WT mCRC. In this way, this work contributes to the development of novel strategies in the medical management and treatment of patients with mCRC.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCetuximabErbB ReceptorsHumansMutationPhospholipase C gammaProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Retrospective StudiesZebrafishCetuximabErbB ReceptorsPhospholipase C gammaProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID34980600
PMCPMC9365369
OpenAlexW4205973440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.