Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34980227›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

CRISPR guides induce gene silencing in plants in the absence of Cas.

Veerendra Kumar Sharma, Sandeep Marla, Wenguang Zheng, Divya Mishra, Jun Huang, Wei Zhang, Geoffrey Preston Morris, David Edward Cook

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. CRISPR-Cas applications in agriculture and plant research.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. CRISPR-based resistance to grapevine virus A.Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Veerendra Kumar SharmaDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Sandeep MarlaDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Wenguang ZhengDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Divya MishraDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Jun HuangDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Geoffrey Preston MorrisDepartment of Soil and Crop Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
David Edward CookDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA. decook@ksu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2719-4701
Kansas State University · USColorado State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas can provide potential advantages over DNA editing, such as avoiding pleiotropic effects of genome editing, providing precise spatiotemporal regulation, and expanded function including antiviral immunity.

resultsHere, we report the use of CRISPR-Cas13 in plants to reduce both viral and endogenous RNA. Unexpectedly, we observe that crRNA designed to guide Cas13 could, in the absence of the Cas13 protein, cause substantial reduction in RNA levels as well. We demonstrate Cas13-independent guide-induced gene silencing (GIGS) in three plant species, including stable transgenic Arabidopsis. Small RNA sequencing during GIGS identifies the production of small RNA that extend beyond the crRNA expressed sequence in samples expressing multi-guide crRNA. Additionally, we demonstrate that mismatches in guide sequences at position 10 and 11 abolish GIGS. Finally, we show that GIGS is elicited by guides that lack the Cas13 direct repeat and can extend to Cas9 designed crRNA of at least 28 base pairs, indicating that GIGS can be elicited through a variety of guide designs and is not dependent on Cas13 crRNA sequences or design.

conclusionsCollectively, our results suggest that GIGS utilizes endogenous RNAi machinery despite the fact that crRNA are unlike canonical triggers of RNAi such as miRNA, hairpins, or long double-stranded RNA. Given similar evidence of Cas13-independent silencing in an insect system, it is likely GIGS is active across many eukaryotes. Our results show that GIGS offers a novel and flexible approach to RNA reduction with potential benefits over existing technologies for crop improvement and functional genomics.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingRNARNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA InterferenceSequence Analysis, RNARNARNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPR-Cas13Guide-induced gene silencingRNA silencingTranscript targetingVirus interference

Identifiers

PMID34980227
PMCPMC8722000
OpenAlexW4206053828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.