Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34980225›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2022

Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

M Meehan, A Shah, J Lobo, J Oates, C Clinton, N Annapureddy, F Xie, J Zhuo, M I Danila, B R England and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M MeehanUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, AL, Birmingham, USA.
A ShahDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
J LoboUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J OatesMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
C ClintonUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, AL, Birmingham, USA.
N AnnapureddyVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
F XieUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, AL, Birmingham, USA.
J ZhuoBristol Myers Squibb, New York, USA.
M I DanilaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, AL, Birmingham, USA.
B R EnglandUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
J R CurtisUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, AL, Birmingham, USA. jrcurtis@uabmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-8976

Funding

Improving the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Lung Disease in Veterans Using Real-World DataIK2CX002203 · VA · OMAHA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Bryant R England · 2021 to 2026
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX002203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purposeInterstitial lung disease (ILD) is an important problem for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, current approaches to ILD case finding in real-world data have been evaluated only in limited settings and identify only prevalent ILD and not new-onset disease. Our objective was to develop, refine, and validate a claims-based algorithm to identify both prevalent and incident ILD in RA patients compared to the gold standard of medical record review.

methodsWe used administrative claims data 2006-2015 from Medicare to derive a cohort of RA patients. We then identified suspected ILD using variations of ILD algorithms to classify both prevalent and incident ILD based on features of the data that included hospitalization vs. outpatient setting, physician specialty, pulmonary-related diagnosis codes, and exclusions for potentially mimicking pulmonary conditions. Positive predictive values (PPV) of several ILD algorithm variants for both prevalent and incident ILD were evaluated.

resultsWe identified 234 linkable RA patients with sufficient data to evaluate for ILD. Overall, 108 (46.2%) of suspected cases were confirmed as ILD. Most cases (64%) were diagnosed in the outpatient setting. The best performing algorithm for prevalent ILD had a PPV of 77% (95% CI 67-84%) and for incident ILD was 96% (95% CI 85-100%).

conclusionCase finding in administrative data for both prevalent and incident interstitial lung disease in RA patients is feasible and has reasonable accuracy to support population-based research and real-world evidence generation.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidLung Diseases, InterstitialAgedAlgorithmsCohort StudiesHumansMedicareUnited StatesAdministrative dataAlgorithmInterstitial lung diseasePositive predictive valueRheumatoid arthritisValidation

Identifiers

PMID34980225
PMCPMC8722182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.