Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34980208›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Social Mobile Approaches to Reducing Weight (SMART) 2.0: protocol of a randomized controlled trial among young adults in university settings.

Shadia J Mansour-Assi, Natalie M Golaszewski, Victoria Lawhun Costello, David Wing, Hailey Persinger, Aaron Coleman, Leslie Lytle, Britta A Larsen, Sonia Jain, Nadir Weibel and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03907462 (SMART 2.0), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03907462 nacompletednot on this map

SMART 2.0: Social Mobile Approaches to Reducing weighT in Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2019 to 2024Enrolled638ConditionsOverweight and ObesityArmsSMART 2.0
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adult obesity treatment and prevention: A trans-agency commentary on the research landscape, gaps, and future opportunities.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shadia J Mansour-AssiCenter for Wireless and Population Health Systems, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Natalie M GolaszewskiCenter for Wireless and Population Health Systems, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Victoria Lawhun CostelloCenter for Wireless and Population Health Systems, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
David WingCenter for Wireless and Population Health Systems, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Hailey PersingerFitabase by Small Steps Labs LLC, San Diego, CA, USA.
Aaron ColemanFitabase by Small Steps Labs LLC, San Diego, CA, USA.
Leslie LytleGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Britta A LarsenHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Sonia JainCenter for Wireless and Population Health Systems, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Nadir WeibelCenter for Wireless and Population Health Systems, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Cheryl L RockDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Kevin PatrickCenter for Wireless and Population Health Systems, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Eric HeklerCenter for Wireless and Population Health Systems, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Job G GodinoCenter for Wireless and Population Health Systems, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. jobg@fhcsd.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4852-6277
University of California San Diego · USUC San Diego Health System · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Social Mobile Approaches to Reduce Weight (SMART) 2.0R01HL136769 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HEKLER, ERIC · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
Improving the Health of Aging Women and Men.T32AG058529 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL134143NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL148938NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136769NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL136769NIA NIH HHS T32 AG058529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcess weight gain in young adulthood is associated with future weight gain and increased risk of chronic disease. Although multimodal, technology-based weight-loss interventions have the potential to promote weight loss among young adults, many interventions have limited personalization, and few have been deployed and evaluated for longer than a year. We aim to assess the effects of a highly personalized, 2-year intervention that uses popular mobile and social technologies to promote weight loss among young adults.

methodsThe Social Mobile Approaches to Reducing Weight (SMART) 2.0 Study is a 24-month parallel-group randomized controlled trial that will include 642 overweight or obese participants, aged 18-35 years, from universities and community colleges in San Diego, CA. All participants receive a wearable activity tracker, connected scale, and corresponding app. Participants randomized to one intervention group receive evidence-based information about weight loss and behavior change techniques via personalized daily text messaging (i.e., SMS/MMS), posts on social media platforms, and online groups. Participants in a second intervention group receive the aforementioned elements in addition to brief, technology-mediated health coaching. Participants in the control group receive a wearable activity tracker, connected scale, and corresponding app alone. The primary outcome is objectively measured weight in kilograms over 24 months. Secondary outcomes include anthropometric measurements; physiological measures; physical activity, diet, sleep, and psychosocial measures; and engagement with intervention modalities. Outcomes are assessed at baseline and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Differences between the randomized groups will be analyzed using a mixed model of repeated measures and will be based on the intent-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that both SMART 2.0 intervention groups will significantly improve weight loss compared to the control group, and the group receiving health coaching will experience the greatest improvement. We further hypothesize that differences in secondary outcomes will favor the intervention groups. There is a critical need to advance understanding of the effectiveness of multimodal, technology-based weight-loss interventions that have the potential for long-term effects and widespread dissemination among young adults. Our findings should inform the implementation of low-cost and scalable interventions for weight loss and risk-reducing health behaviors.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03907462 . Registered on April 9, 2019.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsUniversitiesAdultHumansObesityOverweightRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWeight GainWeight LossYoung AdultDigital healthHealth coachingRandomized controlled trialSocial mediaWearablesWeight lossYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID34980208
PMCPMC8721474
OpenAlexW4205539726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.