Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34980116›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2022

How do we measure gender discrimination? Proposing a construct of gender discrimination through a systematic scoping review.

Laura de la Torre-Pérez, Alba Oliver-Parra, Xavier Torres, Maria Jesús Bertran

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Discrimination and Gender: An Umbrella Review of Psychological Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Feeling discriminated means poor self-perceived health: a gender analysis using SHARE.International journal of health economics and management · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura de la Torre-PérezPreventive Medicine and Epidemiology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. lr.delatorre.prz@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0611-735X
Alba Oliver-ParraConsorci Sanitari de Barcelona, Carrer d'Esteve Terradas, 08023, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8031-5218
Xavier TorresClinical Health Psychology Section of the Institute Clinic of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7442-8750
Maria Jesús BertranPreventive Medicine and Epidemiology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2721-0978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGender discrimination (GD) has been frequently linked to mental health. The heterogeneity of how GD is defined has led to variation around the analysis of GD. This might affect the study of the association between GD and health outcomes. The main goal of this systematic scoping review is to operationalize the definition of the GD construct.

methodsThree search strategies were set in Pubmed, CINAHL and PsycINFO. The first strategy obtained results mainly about women, while the second focused on men. The third strategy focused on the identification of GD questionnaires. The prevalence of GD, factors and consequences associated with GD perception, and forms of discrimination were the principal variables collected. Risk of bias was assessed (PROSPERO:CRD42019120719).

resultsOf the 925 studies obtained, 84 were finally included. 60 GD questionnaires were identified. GD prevalence varied between 3.4 and 67 %. Female gender and a younger age were the factors most frequently related to GD. Poorer mental health was the most frequent consequence. Two components of the GD construct were identified: undervaluation (different recognition, opportunities in access, evaluation standards and expectations) and different treatment (verbal abuse and behaviour).

conclusionsTwo-component GD definition can add order and precision to the measurement, increase response rates and reported GD.

Indexed as

Mental HealthSexismFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesMental HealthSelf-reportSexismSocial discriminationSystematic review [Publication type]

Identifiers

PMID34980116
PMCPMC8722302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.