Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34980101›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2022

Antimicrobial usage in cattle and poultry production in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: pattern and quantity.

Rogers Azabo, Stephen Mshana, Mecky Matee, Sharadhuli I Kimera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antimicrobial usage in broiler poultry farms in Zambia.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antimicrobial Use Survey and Detection of ESBL-Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rogers AzaboDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Parasitology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania. rogersazabo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0214-314X
Stephen MshanaDepartment of Microbiology/Immunology, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Bugando, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Mecky MateeSACIDS Foundation for One Health Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Sharadhuli I KimeraSACIDS Foundation for One Health Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZNational Agricultural Research Institute · UGSouthern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance · TZ

Funding

Government of Tanzania (GOT) and World Bank (WB) through SACIDS Foundation for One Health WB-ACE II Grant PAD1436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobials are extensively used in cattle and poultry production in Tanzania. However, there is dearth of information on its quantitative use. A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted from August to September 2019 in randomly selected poultry and small-scale dairy farms, in three districts of Dar es Salaam City eastern, Tanzania, to assess the practice and quantify antimicrobial use. Descriptive and statistical analyses were performed at a confidence interval of 95%. The ratio of Used Daily Dose (UDD) and Defined Daily Dose (DDD) were used to determine whether the antimicrobial was overdosed or under dosed.

resultsA total of 51 poultry and 65 small-scale dairy farms were involved in the study. The route of antimicrobial administration was 98% orally via drinking water and 2% in feeds for poultry and for small-scale dairy farms, all through parenteral route. Seventeen types of antimicrobials comprising seven classes were recorded in poultry farms while nine belonging to six classes in the small dairy farms. Majority of the farms (poultry, 87.7% and small scale dairy, 84.3%) used antimicrobials for therapeutic purposes. About 41% of the poultry and one third (34%) of the dairy farmers' were not compliant to the drug withdrawal periods. Beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, sulphonamides, tetracyclines and macrolides were the commonly used antimicrobials on these farms. In the poultry farms both those with records and those which relied on recall, antimicrobials were overdosed whereas in the small dairy farms, sulfadimidine, oxytetracycline and neomycin were within the appropriate dosing range (0.8-1.2). The majority (58.6%) of farmers had adequate level of practices (favorable) regarding antimicrobial use in cattle and poultry production. This was associated with the age and level of education of the cattle and poultry farmers.

conclusionThe study revealed a widespread misuse of antimicrobials of different types and classes in both poultry and small-scale dairy farming in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. This result gives insight into the antimicrobial use practices and its quantification. The information obtained can guide and promote prudent use of antimicrobials among the farmers by developing mitigate strategies that reduce antimicrobial resistance risk potentials.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsDairyingPoultryAnimalsCattleCross-Sectional StudiesDrug UtilizationFarmsTanzaniaAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial useCattleDar Es SalaamPoultryPracticesQuantityTanzania

Identifiers

PMID34980101
PMCPMC8722348
OpenAlexW4220723390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.