Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34980091›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

"More than just a medical student": a mixed methods exploration of a structured volunteering programme for undergraduate medical students.

Kerry Badger, Rory Morrice, Olivia Buckeldee, Natalia Cotton, Dilshani Hunukumbure, Oliver Mitchell, Ameer Mustafa, Ebun Oluwole, Juhee Pahuja, Daniel Davies and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "Medical science educator · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kerry BadgerImperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. k.badger@imperial.ac.uk.
Rory MorriceChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Olivia BuckeldeeChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Natalia CottonChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Dilshani HunukumbureThe Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Oliver MitchellChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ameer MustafaImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ebun OluwoleImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Juhee PahujaImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Daniel DaviesImperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Mary J MorrellImperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sue SmithMedical Education Research Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Kathleen Leedham-GreenMedical Education Research Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a result of the COVID-19 pandemic Imperial College School of Medicine developed a structured volunteering programme involving 398 medical students, across eight teaching hospitals. This case study aims to explore the relationship between the processes, context, participant experiences and impacts of the programme so that lessons can be learned for future emergencies and service-learning programmes.

methodsUsing an illuminative approach to evaluation we invited all volunteers and supervisors to complete a mixed-methods survey. This explored differences in experience across demographics and contextual factors, correlations between aspects of induction, supervision and overall experience, and reviewed the impacts of the programme. Quantitative responses were statistically analysed and qualitative reflections were thematically coded to triangulate and explain quantitative findings. Follow up interviews were carried out to check back findings and co-create conclusions.

resultsWe received responses from 61 students and 17 supervisors. Student participants described predominantly altruistic motivations and transformational changes to their professional identity driven by feeling included, having responsibility, and engaging in authentic workplace-based learning afforded by freedom from the assessed curriculum. They reported new perspectives on their future professional role within the multidisciplinary team and the value of workplace-based learning. They reported increases in wellbeing and self-esteem related to feeling included and valued, and positively contributing to service provision at a time of need. Significantly higher overall satisfaction was associated with a personalised induction, active supervision, earlier stage of training, and male gender. Gender-related differences were not explained through our data but have been reported elsewhere and warrant further study. The duration, intensity and type of role that volunteers performed was similar across demographics and did not appear to modulate their overall experience.

conclusionsWhilst acknowledging the uniqueness of emergency volunteering and the survey response rate of 15% of volunteers, we suggest the features of a successful service-learning programme include: a learner-centred induction, regular contact with engaged and appreciative supervisors, and roles where students feel valued. Programmes in similar settings may find that service learning is most impactful earlier in medical students' training and that students with altruistic motivations and meaningful work may flourish without formal outcomes and assessments.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2VolunteersService learningTransformative learningVolunteer

Identifiers

PMID34980091
PMCPMC8721190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.