ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022
Bone marrow aspirate concentrate versus platelet-rich plasma for treating knee osteoarthritis: a one-year non-randomized retrospective comparative study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of BMAC-PRP augmentation on repair of large rotator cuff tears: a clinical evaluation among different age groups.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Randomized clinical trial comparing intra-articular injection of bone marrow aspirate clot and bone marrow aspirate concentrate in grade 3 and 4 knee osteoarthritis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Trial
- Posterior iliac crest vs. proximal tibia: distinct sources of anti-inflammatory and regenerative cells with comparable 6-month clinical outcomes in treatment of osteoarthritis.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Trial
- Concurrent High Tibial Osteotomy, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, and Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
- Adipose-derived and bone marrow aspirate concentrate injections for osteoarthritis: A scoping review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Progress in the clinical use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate for knee osteoarthritis: an expert opinion.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Review
- Platelet-rich plasma-contained drug delivery systems to treat orthopedic injuries.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025Review
- A randomised controlled trial confirms the non-superiority of bone marrow aspirate (BMA) from the posterior iliac crest and proximal tibia compared to platelet rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Comparative outcome analyses of subchondralWorld journal of experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Narrative Review of Clinical Efficacy and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- "Cellularity as a predictive tool for mesenchymal stem cell concentration in bone marrow concentrates: Implications for regenerative medicine".Bone reports · 2025Article
- Orthobiologic injections for hip osteoarthritis: A systematic review of clinical outcomes.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- Innate immune pathway activated mesenchymal stromal cells improve function and histologic outcomes in a rodent osteoarthritis model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Innovative Approaches in Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment: A Comprehensive Review of Bone Marrow-Derived Products.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Comparison of Pain and Complications between Outpatients and Inpatients Treated with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate for Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate for Treatment of Primary Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Single-Center, Non-randomized Study with 2-Year Follow-Up.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Review
- Intra-articular injection of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (mesenchymal stem cells) in KL grade III and IV knee osteoarthritis: 4 year results of 37 knees.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Clinical efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma in the therapy of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.American journal of translational research · 2024Review
- Advances in Stem Cell-Based Therapies in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating condition affecting human body biomechanics and quality of life. Current standard care for knee OA leads to trivial improvement and entails multiple adverse effects or complications. Recently, investigational cell therapies injected intra-articularly, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), have shown safety and therapeutic potency providing patients with pain relief. In the current retrospective comparative study, we investigated the differences in pain and functional improvements in patients with symptomatic knee OA receiving intra-articular injections of BMAC vs PRP.
methodsPain and functionality scores were measured at baseline and at different time points post-injection over 12 months, using 3 self-administered, clinically validated questionnaires: the visual analogue scale (VAS) for assessing pain intensity, the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) for evaluating functionality and knee-related quality of life, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) for evaluating physical function. The repeated-measures general linear model with Sidak test for pairwise comparisons was used to investigate the influence of the treatment on the score evolution within groups (between baseline and each time point) and between groups (overall).
resultsThe BMAC group (n = 26 knees) significantly improved in VAS, KOOS, and WOMAC scores between baseline and 12 months (57.4, 75.88, and 73.95% mean score improvement, respectively). In contrast, the PRP group (n = 13 knees) witnessed nonsignificant improvement in all scores. BMAC, in comparison to PRP, induced significant improvement in outcomes by 29.38% on the VAS scale, 53.89% on the KOOS scale, and 51.71% on the WOMAC scale (P < .002, P < .01, P < .011, respectively).
conclusionsIntra-articular autologous BMAC injections are safe, effective in treating pain, and ameliorate functionality in patients with symptomatic knee OA to a greater extent than PRP injections. Intra-articular autologous BMAC therapy is safe and provides more relief to patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis compared to PRP therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.