ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022
Predictive factors of the accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking outcomes in keratoconus.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review of Keratoconus Cross-Linking Treatment Methods.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Digital transformation of care for keratoconus patients: ML modeling structural outcomes of corneal collagen cross-linking.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation to predict visual acuity and keratometry two years after corneal crosslinking with progressive keratoconus by machine learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and assess preoperative characteristics that may predict outcomes in keratoconus 1 year after accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking (ATE-CXL).
methodsThis prospective study included 93 eyes of 84 consecutive keratoconus patients with 1-year follow-up after ATE-CXL. Preoperative characteristics included corneal astigmatism, anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume, radius of curvature, posterior elevation, central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness, steepest meridian keratometry, flattest meridian keratometry, and the maximum keratometry (Kmax). Data were obtained preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The patient eyes were grouped into 3 subgroups according to CCT and Kmax values to observe the changes of keratoconus progression.
resultsAll patients were successfully operated without complications at any follow-up time point. Mean changes of Kmax from baseline at 6 and 12 months were - 0.60 ± 2.21 D (P = 0.011) and - 0.36 ± 1.58 D (P = 0.030), respectively. Eyes with a thinner CCT and higher Kmax values exhibited a tendency for topographic flattening of ≥1.0 D (P = 0.003; P = 0.003). In the subgroup comparison, the Kmax values decreased significantly at 6 and 12 months after ATE-CXL in the group with CCT ≤ 450 μm (P = 0.018 and P = 0.045); the Kmax values of the group with Kmax > 65.0 D decreased significantly at 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.025).
conclusionATE-CXL is a safe and effective treatment for keratoconus patients. Patients with thinner CCT and higher Kmax values are more likely to benefit from ATE-CXL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.