ArticleBMC cancer2022
Microbiome composition indicate dysbiosis and lower richness in tumor breast tissues compared to healthy adjacent paired tissue, within the same women.
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Unravelling novel microbial players in the breast tissue of TNBC patients: a meta-analytic perspective.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Pooled it
- Breast cancer and microbiome: a systematic review highlighting challenges for clinical translation.BMC women's health · 2025Pooled it
- Intratumoral microbiota composition in women's cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Guideline for designing microbiome studies in neoplastic diseases.GeroScience · 2024Guideline
- IntratumoralAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota centered approaches for breast cancer intervention leveraging probiotics and postbiotics.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Host-microbiome interactions in breast cancer progression and treatment response.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Metagenomic analysis of human feces reveals gut microbiome role in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- The Intratumoral Microbiota in Breast Cancer: Roles in Progression, Immunity, and Therapy.Oncology research · 2026Review
- The human microbiome reshapes the breast cancer immune-metabolic-hormonal microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The intratumoral microbiota in breast cancer: from basic research to clinical translation.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- Article
- Microbial Signatures in Breast Cancer: Exploring New Potentials Across Body Niches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Targeting the Tumor Microbiota in Cancer Therapy Basing on Nanomaterials.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
- Microbial diagnostic features identified across populations possess potential antitumor properties in breast cancer.mSystems · 2025Article
- Article
- Analysis of Skin Microbiome in Facial and Back Acne Patients Based on High-Throughput Sequencing.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- The role and significance of the oncobiota in selected cancers: a review.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Investigating the Anna Karenina principle of the breast microbiome.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women, in whom it reaches 20% of the total neoplasia incidence. Most BCs are considered sporadic and a number of factors, including familiarity, age, hormonal cycles and diet, have been reported to be BC risk factors. Also the gut microbiota plays a role in breast cancer development. In fact, its imbalance has been associated to various human diseases including cancer although a consequential cause-effect phenomenon has never been proven.
methodsThe aim of this work was to characterize the breast tissue microbiome in 34 women affected by BC using an NGS-based method, and analyzing the tumoral and the adjacent non-tumoral tissue of each patient.
resultsThe healthy and tumor tissues differed in bacterial composition and richness: the number of Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) was higher in healthy tissues than in tumor tissues (p = 0.001). Moreover, our analyses, able to investigate from phylum down to species taxa for each sample, revealed major differences in the two richest phyla, namely, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. Notably, the levels of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were, respectively, higher and lower in healthy with respect to tumor tissues.
conclusionsOur study provides information about the breast tissue microbial composition, as compared with very closely adjacent healthy tissue (paired samples within the same woman); the differences found are such to have possible diagnostic and therapeutic implications; further studies are necessary to clarify if the differences found in the breast tissue microbiome are simply an association or a concausative pathogenetic effect in BC. A comparison of different results on similar studies seems not to assess a universal microbiome signature, but single ones depending on the environmental cohorts' locations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.