Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34979999›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Landscape of homologous recombination deficiencies in solid tumours: analyses of two independent genomic datasets.

Zhongwu Lai, Matthew Brosnan, Ethan S Sokol, Mingchao Xie, Jonathan R Dry, Elizabeth A Harrington, J Carl Barrett, Darren Hodgson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Landscape of homologous recombination deficiency in gastric cancer and clinical implications for first-line chemotherapy.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Differential Sensitivity of Germline and SomaticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Clinical case reports · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhongwu LaiAstraZeneca, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA. Zhongwu.Lai@astrazeneca.com.
Matthew BrosnanFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ethan S SokolFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mingchao XieAstraZeneca, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
Jonathan R DryAstraZeneca, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
Elizabeth A HarringtonAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
J Carl BarrettAstraZeneca, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
Darren HodgsonAstraZeneca, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
AstraZeneca (United States) · USFoundation Medicine (United States)AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBTempus Labs (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA repair deficiencies are characteristic of cancer and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is the most common. HRD sensitizes tumour cells to PARP inhibitors so it is important to understand the landscape of HRD across different solid tumour types.

methodsGermline and somatic BRCA mutations in breast and ovarian cancers were evaluated using sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Secondly, a larger independent genomic dataset was analysed to validate the TCGA results and determine the frequency of germline and somatic mutations across 15 different candidate homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, and their relationship with the genetic events of bi-allelic loss, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and tumour mutation burden (TMB).

resultsApproximately one-third of breast and ovarian cancer BRCA mutations were somatic. These showed a similar degree of bi-allelic loss and clinical outcomes to germline mutations, identifying potentially 50% more patients that may benefit from precision treatments. HRR mutations were present in sizable proportions in all tumour types analysed and were associated with high TMB and LOH scores. We also identified numerous BRCA reversion mutations across all tumour types.

conclusionsOur results will facilitate future research into the efficacy of precision oncology treatments, including PARP and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsDatabases, GeneticDatasets as TopicFemaleGenomicsGerm-Line MutationHomologous RecombinationHumansLoss of HeterozygosityMutationOvarian NeoplasmsRecombinational DNA RepairBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBreastcancerGenomic loss of heterozygosityGermlineHomologous recombination deficiencyHomologous recombination repairImmune checkpoint inhibitorsLoss of functionOvarianPARP inhibitorsSomatic

Identifiers

PMID34979999
PMCPMC8722117
OpenAlexW4206294567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.