Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34979970›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Use of potentially driver-impairing drugs among older drivers.

Sarah Zitoun, Edouard Baudouin, Emmanuelle Corruble, Jean-Sébastien Vidal, Laurent Becquemont, Emmanuelle Duron

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01065909 (National Observatory on the Therapeutic Management in Ambulatory Care Patients Aged 65 and Over, With Diabetes Type 2, Chronic Pain or Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01065909 completednot on this map

National Observatory on the Therapeutic Management in Ambulatory Care Patients Aged 65 and Over, With Diabetes Type 2, Chronic Pain or Atrial Fibrillation

TypeobservationalSponsorSanofiRan2009 to 2014Enrolled3,491ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Chronic Pain, Atrial Fibrillation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah ZitounUniversity of Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CESP, Team MOODS, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Edouard BaudouinAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paul Brousse Hospital, Department of Geriatric, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Emmanuelle CorrubleUniversity of Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CESP, Team MOODS, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Jean-Sébastien VidalAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Broca, F-75013, Paris, France.
Laurent BecquemontUniversity of Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CESP, Team MOODS, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Emmanuelle DuronUniversity of Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CESP, Team MOODS, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. emmanuelle.duron@aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoad safety is a major issue among seniors. Potentially Driver-Impairing (PDI) drugs are known to increase the risk of car accident. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to describe PDI-drug consumption among older drivers and determine associated factors.

methodsThe S.AGES cohort is a French non-interventional real-life prospective study of 3700 community-dwelling participants aged ≥65 years old, suffering from type 2 diabetes (T2DM), chronic pain or atrial fibrillation (AF). Baseline data of drivers with known treatment (n = 1783) were used for the analyses. PDI drugs were defined according to the French classification.

resultsOne thousand seven hundred eighty-three drivers were included (66% males; mean age 76 (Standard deviation = 5.78) years old). 21% (n = 373) took PDI drugs, 64% of which took only one (n = 239). The most frequent PDI drugs were: Zolpidem (11%; n = 60); Zopiclone (8%; n = 45); Bromazepam (8%; n = 44); Tramadol (7%; n = 39); Pregabalin (6%; n = 31). Drivers taking PDI drugs had more often chronic pain (OR [95% CI] = 2.30 [1.54-3.46]), history of depressive disorder (4.28 [3.00-6.14]) and polypharmacy (taking at least 5 different medications; 4.32 [2.97-6.41]), and less often T2DM (0.54 [0.37-0.79]), and AF (0.48 [0.32-0.71]). Conversely, they had a lower Activities of Daily Living score (0.34 [0.17-0.68]).

conclusionsThe rate of aged drivers in the S.AGES cohort taking PDI drugs is concerning and highlights the need to carefully assess and reassess PDI-drug prescriptions in this population, particularly hypnotics, anxiolytics and opioids.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01065909 (First posted: February 9th, 2010).

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Pharmaceutical PreparationsAccidents, TrafficActivities of Daily LivingAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesPharmaceutical PreparationsDrivingOlder peoplePotentially driver-impairing drugsPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID34979970
PMCPMC8722131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.