Correction to: Enablers and barriers to implementing care quality improvement program in nursing homes in China.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Machine learning-based screening of sarcopenia in elderly women using non-invasive physiological signals.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
   Article
2. Longitudinal assessment of the relationship between frailty and social relationships among Japanese older adults: a random intercept cross-lagged panel model.BMC public health · 2024
   Article
3. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the trauma-specific frailty index (TSFI) for geriatric trauma patients.BMC geriatrics · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Enablers and barriers to implementing care quality improvement program in nursing homes in China.2021

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.