Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34979337›Full record

ReviewJournal of infection and public health2022

COVID-19 pandemic: What can we learn for better air quality and human health?

Khaiwal Ravindra, Tanbir Singh, Shikha Vardhan, Aakash Shrivastava, Sujeet Singh, Prashant Kumar, Suman Mor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of infection and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Counterintuitive PMInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A hybrid model for daily air quality index prediction and its performance in the face of impact effect of COVID-19 lockdown.Process safety and environmental protection : transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Part B · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Khaiwal RavindraDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India. Electronic address: khaiwal@yahoo.com.
Tanbir SinghDepartment of Environment Studies, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
Shikha VardhanCentre for Environmental & Occupational Health, Climate Change & Health, National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, 110054, India.
Aakash ShrivastavaCentre for Environmental & Occupational Health, Climate Change & Health, National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, 110054, India.
Sujeet SinghCentre for Environmental & Occupational Health, Climate Change & Health, National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, 110054, India.
Prashant KumarGlobal Centre for Clean Air Research (GCARE), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
Suman MorDepartment of Environment Studies, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India. Electronic address: sumanmor@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 lockdown resulted in improved air quality in many cities across the world. With the objective of what could be the new learning from the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdowns for better air quality and human health, a critical synthesis of the available evidence concerning air pollution reduction, the population at risk and natural versus anthropogenic emissions was conducted. Can the new societal norms adopted during pandemics, such as the use of face cover, awareness regarding respiratory hand hygiene, and physical distancing, help in reducing disease burden in the future? The use of masks will be more socially acceptable during the high air pollution episodes in lower and middle-income countries, which could help to reduce air pollution exposure. Although post-pandemic, some air pollution reduction strategies may be affected, such as car-pooling and the use of mass transit systems for commuting to avoid exposure to airborne infections like coronavirus. However, promoting non-motorized modes of transportation such as cycling and walking within cities as currently being enabled in Europe and other countries could overshadow such losses. This demand focus on increasing walkability in a town for all ages and populations, including for a differently-abled community. The study highlighted that for better health and sustainability there. is also a need to promote other measures such as work-from-home, technological infrastructure, the extension of smart cities, and the use of information technology.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionCOVID-19CitiesCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsParticulate MatterSARS-CoV-2Air PollutantsParticulate MatterAir qualityCOVID-19 lockdownPolicy implicationPublic healthSocial determinantsSustainability

Identifiers

PMID34979337
PMCPMC8642828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.