Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34978680›Full record

Trial reportCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2022

Efficacy of calorie labelling for alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages on restaurant menus on noticing information, calorie knowledge, and perceived and actual influence on hypothetical beverage orders: a randomized trial.

Erin Hobin, Ashini Weerasinghe, Nicole Schoer, Lana Vanderlee, Simran Shokar, Sarah Orr, Theresa Poon, David Hammond

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. To use or not to use calorie and health warning labels to curb alcohol consumption.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erin HobinPublic Health Ontario, 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada. erin.hobin@oahpp.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-6335-2984
Ashini WeerasinghePublic Health Ontario, 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Nicole SchoerPublic Health Ontario, 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Lana VanderleeSchool of Nutrition/Centre NUTRISS (Nutrition, Santé et Société), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Simran ShokarPublic Health Ontario, 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Sarah OrrPublic Health Ontario, 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Theresa PoonPublic Health Ontario, 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
David HammondSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo test the efficacy of calorie labelling for alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages on restaurant menus on noticing calorie information, calorie knowledge, and perceived and actual influence on hypothetical beverage orders.

methodsParticipants included upper-level university students of legal drinking age residing in Ontario, Canada (n = 283). Using a between-groups experiment, participants were randomized to view one of two menus: (1) No Calorie Information (control), and (2) Calorie Information adjacent to each beverage. Participants completed a hypothetical ordering task, and measures related to noticing calorie information, calorie knowledge, and actual and perceived influence of calorie information on beverages ordered were assessed. Linear, logistic, and multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine the four outcomes.

resultsThe odds of noticing calorie information were significantly higher in the Calorie Information (72.6%) versus No Calorie Information condition (8.0%) (OR = 43.7, 95% CI: 16.8, 113.8). Compared to those in the No Calorie Information condition, participants in the Calorie Information condition had significantly lower odds of responding 'Don't know' (OR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.09), underestimating (OR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.2), and overestimating (OR = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.2) versus accurately estimating calories in beverages ordered. No significant differences were observed between menu labelling conditions in the calories in beverages ordered or the perceived influence of calorie information on the number of beverages ordered.

conclusionExposure to menus with calorie information increased consumers noticing the calorie information, and accurately estimating calories in alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages ordered. These results have implications for policy-makers considering mandatory menu labelling policy inclusive of alcoholic beverages.

Indexed as

Food LabelingRestaurantsBeveragesEnergy IntakeHumansOntarioAlcoholCaloriesFood labelFood policyRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID34978680
PMCPMC9043159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.