Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34978635›Full record

ArticleThe ultrasound journal2022

Performance of an automated ultrasound device in identifying and tracing the heart in porcine cardiac arrest.

Paul Olszynski, Rory A Marshall, T Dylan Olver, Trevor Oleniuk, Cameron Auser, Tracy Wilson, Paul Atkinson, Rob Woods

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ultrasound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paul OlszynskiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada. p.olszynski@usask.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3102-5652
Rory A MarshallWestern College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
T Dylan OlverWestern College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Trevor OleniukCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Cameron AuserCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Tracy WilsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada.
Paul AtkinsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie, Saint John, Canada.
Rob WoodsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan · CARoyal University Hospital · CASaint John Regional Hospital · CA

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 05323Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation 4522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile intra-arrest echocardiography can be used to guide and monitor chest compression quality, it is not currently feasible on the scene of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Rapid and automated sonographic localization of the heart may provide first-responders guidance to an optimal area of compression without requiring them to interpret ultrasound images. In this proof-of-concept porcine study, we sought to describe the performance of an automated ultrasound device in correctly identifying and tracing the borders of the heart in three distinct states: pre-arrest, arrest, and late arrest.

methodsAn automated ultrasound device (bladder scanner) was placed on the chests of 7 swine, along the left sternal border (4th-8th intercostal spaces). Scanner-generated images were recorded for each space during pre-arrest, arrest, and finally late arrest. 828 images of the LV and LV outflow tract were randomized and 150 (50/state) selected for analysis. Scanner tracings of the heart were then digitally obscured to facilitate tracing by expert reviewers who were blinded to the physiologic state. Reviewer tracings were compared to bladder scanner tracings; with concordance between these images determined via Sørensen-Dice index (SDI).

resultsWhen compared to human reviewers, the bladder scanner was able to identify and trace the borders during cardiac arrest. The bladder scanner performed best at the time of arrest (SDI 0.900 ± 0.059). As resuscitation efforts continued and time from initial arrest increased, the scanner's performance decreased dramatically (SDI 0.597 ± 0.241 in late arrest).

conclusionAn automated ultrasound device (bladder scanner) reliably traced porcine hearts during cardiac arrest. It is possible a device could be developed to indicate where compressions should be performed without requiring the operator to interpret ultrasound images. Further investigation into rapid, automated, sonographic localization of the heart to identify the area of compression in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is warranted.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceAutomationCardiac arrestCardiopulmonary resuscitationEchocardiographyImage segmentation

Identifiers

PMID34978635
PMCPMC8724362
OpenAlexW4206428655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.