ArticleDysphagia2022
Exploring the Use of the Current Perception Threshold in Pharyngeal Paresthesia Patients.
Article in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of otolaryngological diseases on sleep quality, anxiety, and depression: a multicenter observational study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore pharyngeal sensory function by current perception threshold (CPT) measurement in paresthetic pharynx. In total, 58 healthy participants and 66 patients with pharyngeal paresthetic symptoms underwent CPT evaluation. Pharyngeal paresthesia (n = 66) was classified into three categories based on aetiologies: six cases with pain in pharynx; 34 neuropathic patients with glossopharyngeal nerve and/or vagus nerve or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury; and 26 patients with globus pharyngeus. CPT measurements were obtained from bilateral palatoglossal arch and tongue base at 2000, 250 and 5 Hz stimulation frequencies. Ranked from high to low, the CPT values for the bilateral palatoglossal arches and tongue bases were: lower cranial neuropathic patients, globus pharyngeus, healthy participants and patients with pain. The CPT values for neuropathic patients on the injured side were significantly higher than those on the healthy side (P < 0.05). The CPT values for patients with pain in pharynx were significantly lower than those of healthy participants (P < 0.05) when the bilateral tongue bases were stimulated. The CPT measurement is a reliable method for quantitatively assessing pharyngeal sensory function and able to differentiate pharyngeal paresthesia between lower cranial neuropathic and subjective discomfort. Pharyngeal sensory function is more sensitive in patients with pain in pharynx. Pharyngeal sensory function is significantly reduced in lower cranial neuropathic patients, especially on the injured side. Patients with globus pharyngeus have pharyngeal hyposensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.