Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34978597›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2022

Ca

Carolina Jaquenod De Giusti, Julieta Palomeque, Alicia Mattiazzi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Role of AMP deaminase in diabetic cardiomyopathy.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolina Jaquenod De GiustiCentro de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, CCT-La Plata-CONICET, Facultad de Cs. Médicas, UNLP, La Plata, Argentina.
Julieta PalomequeCentro de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, CCT-La Plata-CONICET, Facultad de Cs. Médicas, UNLP, La Plata, Argentina.
Alicia MattiazziCentro de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, CCT-La Plata-CONICET, Facultad de Cs. Médicas, UNLP, La Plata, Argentina. aliciamattiazzi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5166-5606
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic cardiomyopathy is defined as the myocardial dysfunction that suffers patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) in the absence of hypertension and structural heart diseases such as valvular or coronary artery dysfunctions. Since the impact of DM on cardiac function is rather silent and slow, early stages of diabetic cardiomyopathy, known as prediabetes, are poorly recognized, and, on many occasions, cardiac illness is diagnosed only after a severe degree of dysfunction was reached. Therefore, exploration and recognition of the initial pathophysiological mechanisms that lead to cardiac dysfunction in diabetic cardiomyopathy are of vital importance for an on-time diagnosis and treatment of the malady. Among the complex and intricate mechanisms involved in diabetic cardiomyopathy, Ca

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumCytosolDiabetic CardiomyopathiesExcitation Contraction CouplingHumansMitochondria, HeartPrediabetic StateSarcoplasmic ReticulumCalciumCalcium mishandlingDiabetic cardiomyopathyMitochondrial dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID34978597
PMCPMC8721633
OpenAlexW4205843112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.