Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34978571›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2022

Primary COVID-19 vaccine cycle and booster doses efficacy: analysis of Italian nationwide vaccination campaign.

Camilla Mattiuzzi, Giuseppe Lippi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Different Interventions for COVID-19 Primary and Booster Vaccination? Effects of Psychological Factors and Health Policies on Vaccine Uptake.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Predicting COVID-19 booster vaccine intentions.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Camilla MattiuzziService of Clinical Governance, Provincial Agency for Social and Sanitary Services, Trento, Italy.
Giuseppe LippiSection of Clinical Biochemistry and School of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9523-9054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We provide here an updated analysis of primary COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine booster doses efficacy, emerging from the ongoing Italian nationwide COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Primary COVID-19 vaccination efficacy was 76-92% within 6 months, decreasing to 34-80% after 6 months. Administration of vaccine booster doses decreased SARS-CoV-2 infections by 65%, COVID-19-related hospitalizations and deaths by 69% and 97% compared with vaccine efficacy after 6 months, but also decreased SARS-CoV-2 infections by 39% compared with vaccine efficacy within 6 months. These results suggest that COVID-19 vaccine booster doses are important for restoring vaccine efficacy and further limiting virus circulation.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunization ProgramsImmunization, SecondarySARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34978571
PMCPMC8755380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.