ReviewThe journal of physical chemistry. B2022
Perspectives in the Computational Modeling of New Generation, Biocompatible Ionic Liquids.
Review in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Driven Discovery of Sustainable Ionic Liquids for COThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- A perspective on magnetic ionic liquids as multifunctional platforms for drug delivery and biomedical applications.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Tunable stereoselectivity in a wireless electrochemical microreactor using natural chiral ionic liquids.Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC · 2025Article
- Computer-Assisted Strategies as a Tool for Designing Green Monomer-Based Molecularly Imprinted Materials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Computational Advances in Ionic Liquid Applications for Green Chemistry: A Critical Review of Lignin Processing and Machine Learning Approaches.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Are nature's strategies the solutions to the rational design of low-melting, lipophilic ionic liquids?Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2024Review
- Magnetic Ionic Liquids: Current Achievements and Future Perspectives with a Focus on Computational Approaches.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- A Computational Analysis of the Reaction of SOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this Perspective, I review the current state of computational simulations on ionic liquids with an emphasis on the recent biocompatible variants. These materials are used here as an example of relatively complex systems that highlights the limits of some of the approaches commonly used to study their structure and dynamics. The source of these limits consists of the coexistence of nontrivial electrostatic, many-body quantum effects, strong hydrogen bonds, and chemical processes affecting the mutual protonation state of the constituent molecular ions. I also provide examples on how it is possible to overcome these problems using suitable simulation paradigms and recently improved techniques that, I expect, will be gradually introduced in the state-of-the-art of computational simulations of ionic liquids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.