Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34978281›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Exploring Quality Differences in Telemedicine Between Hospital Outpatient Departments and Community Clinics: Cross-sectional Study.

Noora Alhajri, Mecit Can Emre Simsekler, Buthaina Alfalasi, Mohamed Alhashmi, Hamda Memon, Emma Housser, Abdulhamid Mustafa Abdi, Nahed Balalaa, Maryam Al Ali, Raghda Almaashari and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Noora AlhajriCollege of Medicine and Health Science, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7205-7493
Mecit Can Emre SimseklerCollege of Engineering, Khalifa University, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1555-5012
Buthaina AlfalasiDepartment of Family Medicine, Zayed Military Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6186-3323
Mohamed AlhashmiCollege of Medicine and Health Science, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8950-2503
Hamda MemonCollege of Medicine and Health Science, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8857-8146
Emma HousserCollege of Medicine and Health Science, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6807-8598
Abdulhamid Mustafa AbdiCollege of Medicine and Health Science, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2159-5651
Nahed BalalaaDepartment of General Surgery, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5420-4947
Maryam Al AliAmbulatory Healthcare Services, Abu Dhabi Health Services Company, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0502-4899
Raghda AlmaashariDepartment of Dermatology, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4286-9981
Shammah Al MemariAbu Dhabi Public Health Center, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2988-4543
Farida Al HosaniAbu Dhabi Public Health Center, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4901-0280
Yousif Al ZaabiDepartment of Health, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7933-6073
Shereena AlmazroueiAbu Dhabi Public Health Center, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6596-7309
Hamed AlhashemiDepartment of Health, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7376-5758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemedicine is a care delivery modality that has the potential to broaden the reach and flexibility of health care services. In the United Arab Emirates, telemedicine services are mainly delivered through either integrated hospital outpatient department (OPDs) or community clinics. However, it is unknown if patients' perceptions of, and satisfaction with, telemedicine services differ between these two types of health care systems during the COVID-19 pandemic.

objectiveWe aimed to explore the differences in patients' perceptions of, and satisfaction with, telemedicine between hospital OPDs and community clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also aimed to identify patient- or visit-related characteristics contributing to patient satisfaction with telemedicine.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study that was conducted at Abu Dhabi health care centers, we invited outpatients aged 18 years or over, who completed a telemedicine visit during the COVID-19 pandemic, to participate in our study. Patients' perceptions of, and satisfaction with, telemedicine regarding the two system types (ie, hospital OPDs and community clinics) were assessed using an online survey that was sent as a link through the SMS system. Regression models were used to describe the association between patient- and visit-related characteristics, as well as the perception of, and satisfaction with, telemedicine services.

resultsA total of 515 patients participated in this survey. Patients' satisfaction with telemedicine services was equally high among the settings, with no statistically significant difference between the two setting types (hospital OPDs: 253/343, 73.8%; community clinics: 114/172, 66.3%; P=.19). Video consultation was significantly associated with increased patient satisfaction (odds ratio [OR] 2.57, 95% CI 1.04-6.33; P=.04) and patients' support of the transition to telemedicine use during and after the pandemic (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.18-7.07; P=.02). Patients who used video consultations were more likely to report that telemedicine improved access to health care services (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.71-8.03; P=.02), reduced waiting times and travel costs (OR 4.94, 95% CI 1.15-21.19; P=.03), addressed patients' needs (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.13-6.11; P=.03), and eased expression of patients' medical concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic (OR 2.19, 95% CI 0.89-5.38; P=.09). Surprisingly, middle-aged patients were two times more likely to be satisfied with telemedicine services (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.09-4.14; P=.03), as compared to any other age group in this study.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that patient satisfaction was unaffected by the health system setting in which patients received the teleconsultations, whether they were at hospitals or community clinics. Video consultation was associated with increased patient satisfaction with telemedicine services. Efforts should be focused on strategic planning for enhanced telemedicine services, video consultation in particular, for both emergent circumstances, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and day-to-day health care delivery.

Indexed as

audio consultationcommunity clinicCOVID-19hospitalOPDoutpatient departmentpatient satisfactionpolicy makingtechnology acceptanceUAEvideo consultation

Identifiers

PMID34978281
PMCPMC8849258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.