Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34978051›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2022

Diagnostic performance of serum interleukin-6 in pediatric acute appendicitis: a systematic review.

Javier Arredondo Montero, Carlos Bardají Pascual, Mónica Bronte Anaut, Natalia López-Andrés, Giuseppa Antona, Nerea Martín-Calvo

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic performance of calprotectin and APPY-1 test in pediatric acute appendicitis: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Javier Arredondo MonteroPediatric Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Calle Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain. Javier.montero.arredondo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0943-6367
Carlos Bardají PascualPediatric Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Calle Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Mónica Bronte AnautPathology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Natalia López-AndrésCardiovascular Translational Research, Navarrabiomed (Miguel Servet Foundation), Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Giuseppa AntonaPediatric Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Calle Irunlarrea 3, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Nerea Martín-CalvoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversidad Publica de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the radiological and analytical advances of the last decades, there is still a significant rate of diagnostic error in pediatric acute appendicitis. In recent years, multiple biomarkers have emerged as potential diagnostic tools. This study aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of serum interleukin-6 in pediatric acute appendicitis.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the literature that involved an extensive search in the main databases of medical bibliography (Medline, PubMed, Web of Science and SciELO). Two independent reviewers selected the relevant articles based on the previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Methodological quality of the selected article was rated using the QUADAS2 index. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers.

resultsThe research in the medical bibliography databases resulted in 68 articles. We removed 26 duplicates. Among the remaining 42 articles, we excluded 33 following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the final 9 studies included in this review, 8 provided measured serum interleukin-6 values, and all of them reported significant differences between groups, but inconsistent results regarding sensitivity and specificity.

conclusionsThe diagnostic performance of interleukine-6 alone for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children is limited. The sensitivity and specificity of interleukine-6 for the diagnosis of non-complicated acute appendicitis in the pediatric population are moderate but increased in complicated appendicitis. There seems to be a direct relationship between serum level of interleukin-6 and the hours of evolution of abdominal pain in children with acute appendicitis. The increasingly widespread use of non-operative management of acute appendicitis warrants further exploration of the classificatory potential of this marker between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. We consider that this may be an avenue of research to explore in the future.

Indexed as

AppendicitisInterleukin-6Acute DiseaseBiomarkersChildHumansSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersIL6 protein, humanInterleukin-6Acute appendicitisChildrenInterleukin-6PediatricSensitivitySpecificitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34978051
OpenAlexW4206754818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.