Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34978039›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

A modified approach to quantify aquifer vulnerability to pollution towards sustainable groundwater management in Irrigated Indus Basin.

Muhammad Umar, Shahbaz Nasir Khan, Arfan Arshad, Rana Ammar Aslam, Hafiz Muhammad Safdar Khan, Haroon Rashid, Quoc Bao Pham, Abdul Nasir, Rabeea Noor, Khaled Mohamed Khedher and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Muhammad UmarDepartment of Structures and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Shahbaz Nasir KhanDepartment of Structures and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan. shahbaz.nasir.khan@uaf.edu.pk.
Arfan ArshadDepartment of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Rana Ammar AslamDepartment of Structures and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Hafiz Muhammad Safdar KhanDepartment of Structures and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Haroon RashidDepartment of Structures and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Quoc Bao PhamInstitute of Applied Technology, Thu Dau Mot University, Binh Duong Province, Vietnam.
Abdul NasirDepartment of Structures and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Rabeea NoorDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 34200, Pakistan.
Khaled Mohamed KhedherDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, 61421, Saudi Arabia.
Duong Tran AnhHUTECH University, 475A, Dien Bien Phu, Ward 25, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. ta.duong@hutech.edu.vn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of groundwater in the study watershed has worsened because of industrial effluents and residential wastes from the urbanized cities; therefore, there is an important need to explore the aquifer vulnerability to pollution for sustainable groundwater management in the Irrigated Indus Basin (IIB). This study proposed a novel methodology to quantify groundwater vulnerability using two fully independent methodologies: the first by reintroducing an improved recharge factor (R) map and the second by incorporating three different weight and rating schemes into a traditional DRASTIC framework to improve the performance of the DRASTIC approach. In the current study, we composed a recharge map from Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) output (namely SWAT recharge map) with a drainage density map to retrieve an improved composite recharge map (SWAT-CRM). SWAT-CRM along with other thematic layers was combined using weightage overlay analysis to prepare the maps of groundwater vulnerability index (VI). The weight scale (w) and rating scale (r) were assigned based on a survey of available literature, and we then amended them using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and a probability frequency ratio (PFR) technique. Results depicted that the region under high groundwater vulnerability was found to be 5-22% using traditional recharge maps, while those are 9-23% using improved SWAT-CRM. The area under the curve (AUC) revealed that groundwater vulnerability zones predicted with SWAT-CRM outperformed the DRASTIC model applied with the traditional recharge map. Groundwater electrical conductivity (EC) was>2500 mS/cm in the high groundwater vulnerability zones, while it was <1000 mS/cm in the low groundwater vulnerability zones. The outcomes of this study can be used to improve the sustainability of the groundwater resources in IIB through proper land-use management practices.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringGroundwaterSoilWaterWater PollutionWater SupplySoilWaterAnalytical hierarchy process (AHP)Drainage densityDRASTICProbability frequency ratio (PFR)SWATVulnerability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.