Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977986›Full record

Observational studyAdvances in therapy2022

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Belgian Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from the Prospective Observational APOLO Study.

Kurt de Vlam, Adrien Nzeusseu Toukap, Marie-Joëlle Kaiser, Johan Vanhoof, Philip Remans, Marthe Van den Berghe, Silvana Di Romana, Filip Van den Bosch, Rik Lories

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03096990 (An Observational Study of the Real-life Management of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Treated With Otezla®), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03096990 completednot on this map

An Observational Study of the Real-life Management of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Treated With Otezla® (Apremilast) in Belgium

TypeobservationalSponsorAmgenRan2017 to 2018Enrolled106ConditionsArthritis, PsoriaticArmsapremilast
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Kurt de VlamDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Adrien Nzeusseu ToukapDepartment of Rheumatology, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Marie-Joëlle KaiserDepartment of Rheumatology, GIGA Research, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Johan VanhoofDepartment of Rheumatology, ReumaClinic Genk, Genk, Belgium.
Philip RemansDepartment of Rheumatology, ReumaClinic Genk, Genk, Belgium.
Marthe Van den BergheDepartment of Rheumatology, ASZ Aalst, Aalst, Belgium.
Silvana Di RomanaDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Filip Van den BoschDepartment of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Rik LoriesDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Rik.Lories@kuleuven.be.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre · BECliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEGhent University Hospital · BEKU Leuven · BEOnze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital · BEUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionApremilast is approved for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Real-world evidence on the efficacy and safety of apremilast in clinical practice is limited. We assessed the use of apremilast in patients with PsA in Belgium clinical practice.

methodsThe multicentre, observational, prospective APOLO study enrolled patients with active PsA initiating apremilast in Belgium between April 2017 and December 2018. Primary outcome was PsA Response Criteria (PsARC) after 6 months of apremilast treatment. Secondary outcomes included PsA Impact of Disease 12 (PsAID12) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Disease-specific outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were analysed for patients who received apremilast within 30 days prior to their study inclusion and completed at least 150 days of treatment (reference set [REF]).

resultsOf 107 patients enrolled in the study, 106 received at least one dose of apremilast and 69 were included in the REF. PsARC response was achieved by 43.5% of patients (30/69) in the REF at month 6; mean global and composite scores including 68-joint count for pain/tenderness (68-TJC) and 66-joint count for swelling (66-SJC) improved, and 27% and 42% of patients with 68-TJC and 66-SJC > 0 at baseline had complete joint count resolution, respectively. Mean global and composite PsAID12 and HAQ-DI scores decreased at 6 months, indicating improved quality of life. Apremilast was well tolerated and the reported adverse events were in line with the known safety profile.

conclusionResults from the APOLO study indicate that treatment with apremilast in Belgian clinical practice improves the signs and symptoms of PsA as well as patient quality of life. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03096990.

Indexed as

Arthritis, PsoriaticAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBelgiumHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeThalidomideTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalapremilastThalidomideApremilastPatient-reported outcomePsoriatic arthritisReal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID34977986
PMCPMC8866349
OpenAlexW4206441114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.