Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977979›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2022

Assessing the potential of the two-peptide lantibiotic lichenicidin as a new generation antimicrobial.

Joana C Barbosa, Ítala C Silva, Tânia Caetano, Eva Mösker, Maria Seidel, Joana Lourenço, Roderich D Süssmuth, Nuno C Santos, Sónia Gonçalves, Sónia Mendo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmaceutics · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Inhibitory Effect ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joana C BarbosaDepartment of Biology & Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9437-5687
Ítala C SilvaInstituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4589-2757
Tânia CaetanoDepartment of Biology & Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9157-8761
Eva MöskerInstitut für Chemie, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Maria SeidelInstitut für Chemie, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2838-8230
Joana LourençoDepartment of Biology & Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0301-6385
Roderich D SüssmuthInstitut für Chemie, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7027-2069
Nuno C SantosInstituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0580-0475
Sónia GonçalvesInstituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2903-4282
Sónia MendoDepartment of Biology & Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal. smendo@ua.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5057-5660
University of Aveiro · PTTechnische Universität Berlin · DEUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia CEECIND/01463/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-027569Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PD/BD/136880/2018Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/97099/2013Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BPD/77900/2011Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BPD/92554/2013Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/50017/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDP/50017/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lantibiotics are a promising class of natural antimicrobial peptides. Lichenicidin is a two-peptide lantibiotic in which two mature peptides act synergistically to exhibit full bioactivity. Considering the two-peptide lantibiotics described so far, only cytolysin has been deeply characterized in terms of toxicity towards eukaryotic cells and it was found to be hemolytic and cytotoxic. This work aimed to improve the production of lichenicidin in vivo and characterize its antibacterial activity and toxicity against human cells. Peptides were purified and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined against several strains; a time-kill assay was performed with Staphylococcus aureus. The hemolytic effect of lichenicidin was evaluated on blood samples from healthy donors and its toxicity towards human fibroblasts. The quantity of purified peptides was 1 mg/l Bliα and 0.4 mg/l Bliβ. MIC for methicillin-sensitive and resistant S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA) strains were 16-32 µg/ml and 64-128 µg/ml, respectively. At the MIC, lichenicidin took less than 3 h to eliminate MSSA, indicating a strong bactericidal effect. It induces cell lysis at the highest concentration, an effect that might be potentiated by Bliβ. Lichenicidin was not cytotoxic to human erythrocytes and fibroblasts. In this work, we evaluated the therapeutic potential of lichenicidin as a possible antimicrobial alternative.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial PeptidesBacteriaBacterial InfectionsBacteriocinsCell LineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug SynergismFibroblastsHemolysisHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPeptidesAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial PeptidesBacteriocinsPeptidesCytotoxicityHemolysisHeterologous expressionLanthipeptidesLantibioticsNatural antimicrobial peptides

Identifiers

PMID34977979
OpenAlexW4205690656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.