Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977976›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports2022

PlantRep: a database of plant repetitive elements.

Xizhi Luo, Shiyu Chen, Yu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Genome Studies in Four Species ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Range-wide differential adaptation and genomic offset in critically endangered Asian rosewoods.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xizhi LuoShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518124, China.
Shiyu ChenShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518124, China.
Yu ZhangShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518124, China. zhangyu07@caas.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6547-6243

Funding

Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32070250Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2020A1515011030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageWe re-annotated repeats of 459 plant genomes and released a new database: PlantRep ( http://www.plantrep.cn/ ). PlantRep sheds lights of repeat evolution and provides fundamental data for deep exploration of genome.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsGenome, PlantEvolution, MolecularRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNA Transposable ElementsDatabase of repeat sequencesEvolution of plant genomeTransposable element

Identifiers

PMID34977976
PMCPMC9035001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.