Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977972›Full record

Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2022

Exposure-response analyses of erdafitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Anne-Gaëlle Dosne, Elodie Valade, Nele Goeyvaerts, Peter De Porre, Anjali Avadhani, Anne O'Hagan, Lilian Y Li, Daniele Ouellet, Juan Jose Perez Ruixo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02365597 (A Phase 2, Two-arm Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Determine the Efficacy and the Safety of Two Different Dose Regimens of a Pan-FGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor JNJ-42756493 in Subjects With Metastatic or Surgically Unresectable Urothelial Cancer With FGFR Genomic Alterations), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02365597 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase 2, Two-arm Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Determine the Efficacy and the Safety of Two Different Dose Regimens of a Pan-FGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor JNJ-42756493 in Subjects With Metastatic or Surgically Unresectable Urothelial Cancer With FGFR Genomic Alterations

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2015 to 2027Enrolled239ConditionsUrothelial CancerArmsErdafitinib, Midazolam, Metformin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne-Gaëlle DosneJanssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Elodie ValadeJanssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Nele GoeyvaertsJanssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Peter De PorreJanssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Anjali AvadhaniJanssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Anne O'HaganJanssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Lilian Y LiJanssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Daniele OuelletJanssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Juan Jose Perez RuixoJanssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium. jjperezr@ITS.JNJ.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9890-745X
Janssen (Belgium) · BEJanssen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure-response analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between selected efficacy and safety endpoints and serum phosphate (PO4) concentrations, a potential biomarker of efficacy and safety, in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients with FGFR alterations treated with erdafitinib.

methodsData from two dosing regimens of erdafitinib in a phase 2 study (NCT02365597), 6 and 8-mg/day with provision for pharmacodynamically guided titration per serum PO4 levels, were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard or logistic regression models. Efficacy endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Safety endpoints were adverse events typical for FGFR inhibitors.

resultsExposure-efficacy analyses on 156 patients (6-mg = 68; 8-mg = 88) showed that patients with higher serum PO4 levels within the first 6 weeks showed better OS (hazard ratio 0.57 [95% CI 0.46-0.72] per mg/dL of PO4; p = 0.01), PFS (hazard ratio 0.80 [0.67-0.94] per mg/dL of PO4; p = 0.01), and ORR (odds ratio 1.38 [1.02-1.86] per mg/dL of PO4; p = 0.04). Exposure-safety analyses on 177 patients (6-mg = 78; 8-mg = 99) showed that the incidence of selected adverse events associated with on-target off-tumor effects significantly rose with higher PO4.

conclusionsThe exploratory relationship between serum PO4 levels and efficacy/safety outcomes supported the use of pharmacodynamically guided dose titration to optimize erdafitinib's therapeutic benefit/risk ratio. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02365597.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Transitional CellDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesQuinoxalinesReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorSurvival RateUrinary Bladder NeoplasmserdafitinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesQuinoxalinesReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorErdafitinibExposure–response analysesFGFR inhibitorMetastatic urothelial carcinomaPharmacodynamically guided individual dose titration

Identifiers

PMID34977972
PMCPMC8807442
OpenAlexW4206189974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.