ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2022
Differences in the incidence of aflibercept-related sterile endophthalmitis according to types of disposable syringes used.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the difference between the incidences of sterile endophthalmitis after administration of intravitreal aflibercept injection using two different types of syringes.
methodsWe administered a total of 498 intravitreal aflibercept injections between September 2017 and August 2021. The disposable syringe used was changed from a 1-mL disposable syringe (Profi syringe, Shinchang Medical., Ltd. Korea) to a 1-mL Becton Dickenson Luer-Lok syringe (BD, Franklin, NJ, USA) in September 2019. Thus, the patients who received injections before and after September 1, 2019, were classified into group 1 and group 2, respectively. The incidence of aflibercept-related sterile endophthalmitis between the two groups was compared.
resultsIn group 1, six (2.791%) out of 215 cases were diagnosed with sterile endophthalmitis and prescribed topical or oral steroids. In group 2, one (0.353%) out of 283 cases was diagnosed with sterile endophthalmitis and prescribed a steroid eye drop. The incidence of sterile endophthalmitis was significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.046).
conclusionThe BD Luer-Lok syringe is associated with a lower incidence of aflibercept-related sterile endophthalmitis than the conventional polypropylene syringe. Differences in immunogenicity associated with silicone oil lubricants within the syringes might be one of the potential reasons behind the difference in the incidence of the sterile endophthalmitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34977967What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.