Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977965›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2022

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction related complications: 2D and 3D high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Uma Thakur, Vaibhav Gulati, Jay Shah, David Tietze, Avneesh Chhabra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Uma ThakurDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Vaibhav GulatiDepartment of Radiology, Imaging Associates at National Heart Institute, New Delhi, India.
Jay ShahDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
David TietzeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Avneesh ChhabraDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. avneesh.chhabra@utsouthwestern.edu.
Southwestern Medical CenterThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USNational Heart Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common indication for sports-related major surgery and accounts for a large proportion of ligamentous injuries in athletes. The advancements in 2D and 3D MR imaging have provided considerable potential for a one-stop shop radiation-free assessment with an all-in-one modality examination of the knee, for both soft-tissue and bone evaluations. This article reviews ACL injuries and types of surgical managements with illustrative examples using high resolution 2D and 3D MR imaging. Various complications of ACL reconstruction procedures are highlighted with a focus on the use of advanced MR imaging and relevant arthroscopic correlations.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAnterior Cruciate LigamentHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance Imaging3D MRIACLComplicationsMultiplanar reconstructionsSurgery

Identifiers

PMID34977965
OpenAlexW4205943098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.