Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977840›Full record

ArticleJournal of hazardous materials letters2020

Frontier review on the propensity and repercussion of SARS-CoV-2 migration to aquatic environment.

Manish Kumar, Alok Kumar Thakur, Payal Mazumder, Keisuke Kuroda, Sanjeeb Mohapatra, Jörg Rinklebe, Al Ramanathan, Zeynep Cetecioglu, Sharad Jain, Vinay Kumar Tyagi and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hazardous materials letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in Bangladesh: Opportunities and challenges.Current opinion in environmental science & health · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Manish KumarDiscipline of Earth Science, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382 355, India.
Alok Kumar ThakurDiscipline of Earth Science, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382 355, India.
Payal MazumderCentre for the Environment, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam 781039, India.
Keisuke KurodaDepartment of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Toyama Prefectural University, Toyama 9390398, Japan.
Sanjeeb MohapatraEnvironmental Science and Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India.
Jörg RinklebeLaboratory of Soil- and Groundwater-Management, School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal 42285, Germany.
Al RamanathanSchool of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India.
Zeynep CeteciogluDepartment of Chemical Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 42, SE100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
Sharad JainDepartment of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India.
Vinay Kumar TyagiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India.
Petros GikasSchool of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania 73100, Greece.
Sudip ChakrabortyDepartment of IngegneriaModellisticaElettronica&Sistemistica,University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci, Cubo 42/a, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy.
M Tahmidul IslamDepartment of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 10B, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden.
Arslan AhmadKWR Water Cycle Research Institute, Groningenhaven 7, 3433 PE Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Anil V ShahGujarat Pollution Control Board, Sector-10A, Gandhinagar 382010, Gujarat, India.
Arbind Kumar PatelDiscipline of Earth Science, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382 355, India.
Toru WatanabeDepartment of Food, Life and Environmental Sciences, Yamagata University, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, Japan.
Meththika VithanageEcosphere Resilience Research Centre, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
Kyle BibbyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Notre Dame, 156 Fitzpatrick Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, United States.
Masaaki KitajimaDivision of Environmental Engineering, Hokkaido University, North 13 West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8628, Japan.
Prosun BhattacharyaDepartment of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 10B, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased concern has recently emerged pertaining to the occurrence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in aquatic environment during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While infectious SARS-CoV-2 has yet to be identified in the aquatic environment, the virus potentially enters the wastewater stream from patient excretions and a precautionary approach dictates evaluating transmission pathways to ensure public health and safety. Although enveloped viruses have presumed low persistence in water and are generally susceptible to inactivation by environmental stressors, previously identified enveloped viruses persist in the aqueous environment from days to several weeks. Our analysis suggests that not only the surface water, but also groundwater, represent SARS-CoV-2 control points through possible leaching and infiltrations of effluents from health care facilities, sewage, and drainage water. Most fecally transmitted viruses are highly persistent in the aquatic environment, and therefore, the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in water is essential to inform its fate in water, wastewater and groundwater and subsequent human exposure.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19GroundwaterPathwaysWater

Identifiers

PMID34977840
PMCPMC7456799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.