Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977838›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2022

Quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: online survey investigating maternal perspectives in 12 countries of the WHO European Region.

Marzia Lazzerini, Benedetta Covi, Ilaria Mariani, Zalka Drglin, Maryse Arendt, Ingvild Hersoug Nedberg, Helen Elden, Raquel Costa, Daniela Drandić, Jelena Radetić and 24 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04847336 (IMAGINE EURO), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04847336 unknown statusnot on this map

IMAGINE EURO (Improving MAternal Newborn carE In the EURO Region): Maternal and Newborn Health Service Preparedness, Quality and Resilience, Among Countries of the WHO European Region, During the COVID-19 Pandemic

TypeobservationalSponsorWHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, TriesteRan2020 to 2022Enrolled10,000ConditionsQuality of Care During ChildbirthArmsNo intervention is planned
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Experiences of disrespect and abuse during childbirth in the World Health Organization European region: A mixed-method study among 22 countries.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Consent for interventions during childbirth: A national population-based study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Marzia LazzeriniWHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Benedetta CoviWHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Ilaria MarianiWHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Zalka DrglinNational Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maryse ArendtBeruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional association of the Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Ingvild Hersoug NedbergDepartment of community medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway.
Helen EldenInstitute of Health and Care sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Raquel CostaEPIUnit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Daniela DrandićRoda - Parents in Action, Zagreb, Croatia.
Jelena RadetićCentar za mame, Belgrade, Serbia.
Marina Ruxandra OteleaUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania.
Céline MianiDepartment of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Serena BrigidiDepartment of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work. Medical Anthropology Research Center (MARC). Rovira i Virgili University (URV), Tarragona, Spain.
Virginie RozéeSexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France.
Barbara Mihevc PonikvarNational Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Barbara TaschBeruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional association of the Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Sigrun KongslienDepartment of health and care sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway.
Karolina LindenInstitute of Health and Care sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Catarina BarataInstituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Magdalena KurbanovićFaculty of Health Studies, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Jovana RužičićCentar za mame, Belgrade, Serbia.
Stephanie Batram-ZantvoortDepartment of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Lara Martín CastañedaInstitut Català de la Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain.
Elise de La RochebrochardSexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France.
Anja BohinecNational Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Eline Skirnisdottir VikDepartment of health and caring sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway.
Mehreen ZaighamObstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Teresa SantosUniversidade Europeia, Lisboa, Portugal.
Lisa WandschneiderDepartment of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Ana Canales ViverInstitut Català d'Antropologia (ICA), Barcelona, Spain.
Amira ĆerimagićNGO Baby Steps, Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina.
Emma SacksDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Emanuelle Pessa ValenteWHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
IMAgiNE EURO study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMulti-country studies assessing the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as defined by WHO Standards, are lacking.

methodsWomen who gave birth in 12 countries of the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020 - March 15, 2021 answered an online questionnaire, including 40 WHO Standard-based Quality Measures.

findings21,027 mothers were included in the analysis. Among those who experienced labour (N=18,063), 41·8% (26·1%- 63·5%) experienced difficulties in accessing antenatal care, 62% (12·6%-99·0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 31·1% (16·5%-56·9%) received inadequate breastfeeding support, 34·4% (5·2%-64·8%) reported that health workers were not always using protective personal equipment, and 31·8% (17·8%-53·1%) rated the health workers' number as "insufficient". Episiotomy was performed in 20·1% (6·1%-66·0%) of spontaneous vaginal births and fundal pressure applied in 41·2% (11·5% -100%) of instrumental vaginal births. In addition, 23·9% women felt they were not treated with dignity (12·8%-59·8%), 12·5% (7·0%-23·4%) suffered abuse, and 2·4% (0·1%-26·2%) made informal payments. Most findings were significantly worse among women with prelabour caesarean birth (N=2,964). Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Croatia, Romania, Serbia showing significant lower QMNC Indexes and Luxemburg showing a significantly higher QMNC Index than the total sample. Younger women and those with operative births also reported significantly lower QMNC Indexes.

interpretationMothers reports revealed large inequities in QMNC across countries of the WHO European Region. Quality improvement initiatives to reduce these inequities and promote evidence-based, patient-centred respectful care for all mothers and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond are urgently needed.

fundingThe study was financially supported by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847336.

Indexed as

COVID-19European Regionfacilitymaternalnewbornquality of carequestionnairerespectful maternity caresurveyWHO

Identifiers

PMID34977838
PMCPMC8703114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.