Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977667›Full record

ReviewArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2021

Prevalence, Biomechanics, and Pathologies of the Meniscofemoral Ligaments: A Systematic Review.

David G Deckey, Sailesh Tummala, Jens T Verhey, Jeffrey D Hassebrock, Donald Dulle, Mark D Miller, Anikar Chhabra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The meniscofemoral ligaments do not contribute to restriction of posterior tibial translation: A robotic biomechanical analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David G DeckeyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.
Sailesh TummalaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.
Jens T VerheyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.
Jeffrey D HassebrockDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.
Donald DulleDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.
Mark D MillerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, U.S.A.
Anikar ChhabraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo systematically review the literature to examine current understanding of the meniscofemoral ligaments (MFLs), their function, their importance in clinical management, and known anatomical variants.

methodsA systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Studies were included if they reported on the biomechanical, radiographic, or arthroscopic evaluation of human MFLs, or if they reported on an anatomical variant. These were then categorized as cadaveric, radiographic, or clinical. Biomechanical, radiographic, patient-reported, and functional outcomes data were recorded.

resultsForty-seven studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 26 of them were included in the quantitative analysis. Of these, there were 15 cadaveric, 3 arthroscopic, and 9 radiographic studies that reported on the prevalence of MFLs. Overall, when looking at all modalities, the presence of either the anterior or posterior MFL (aMFL, pMFL) has been noted to be 70.8%, with it being the aMFL 17.4% and the pMFL 40.6%. The presence of both ligaments occurs in approximately 17.6% of individuals. Eleven reported on mean MFL length and thickness. When evaluating mean length in both men and women, the aMFL has been reported between 21.6 and 28.3 mm and the pMFL length in this population is between 23.4 and 31.2 mm. Five reported on cross-sectional area. Nine additional papers report anatomical variants.

conclusionsThis review shows that there continues to be a variable incidence of MFLs reported in the literature, but our understanding of their function continues to broaden. A growing number of anatomic and biomechanical studies have demonstrated the importance of the MFLs in supporting knee stability. Specifically, the MFLs serve an important role in protecting the lateral meniscus and augmenting the function of the posterior cruciate ligament. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings will aid the clinician in both identifying and treating pathologies of the meniscofemoral ligaments.

Identifiers

PMID34977667
PMCPMC8689266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.