ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2021
Both Open and Arthroscopic Latarjet Result in Excellent Outcomes and Low Recurrence Rates for Anterior Shoulder Instability.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Moderate to high levels of spin in studies comparing open and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures for anterior shoulder instability: A systematic review from the LaTour Group.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Pooled it
- Arthroscopic Latarjet yields better union and prevention of instability compared to arthroscopic bony Bankart repair in shoulders with recurrent anterior instability: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Pooled it
- Psychological factors influencing return to sport after shoulder stabilization: assessment tools and intervention strategies-a narrative review.Annals of joint · 2026Review
- Remodelling and the fate of bone grafts in shoulder instability surgery.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Similar outcomes, but significantly lower complication rate with arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage versus open or arthroscopic Latarjet for shoulder instability across a wide range of glenoid bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
- Patient specific instrumentation for open Latarjet procedure. Technique, accuracy, and short-term outcome. A prospective case series.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Article
- Up-to-date concepts and procedures in shoulder instability: a comprehensive review.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of the Latarjet procedure in a North American population.JSES international · 2025Article
- Arthroscopic Latarjet: Transition from Open to All Arthroscopic.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- Surgical Variations of the Modified Latarjet Procedure: A Literature Review and Video-Illustrated Surgical Technique.Cureus · 2024Review
- Current Trends and Outcomes for Open vs. Arthroscopic Latarjet.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024Review
- Long-term outcomes of anterior shoulder instability treated with open latarjet procedure - a systematic review of outcomes at a minimum 15-year follow-up.Shoulder & elbow · 2024Review
- All Arthroscopic Salvage Technique for Intraoperative Vertical Split Coracoid Graft Fracture in Latarjet Procedure-Technical Note.Arthroscopy techniques · 2024Article
- Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure: current concepts and surgical techniques.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2023Article
- Screw-Related Complications May Occur at a Greater Rate After Arthroscopic Versus Open Latarjet Procedure: A Systematic Review.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Review
- Open Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes of open Latarjet (OL) compared to arthroscopic Latarjet (AL) for anterior shoulder instability.
methodsA retrospective review of patients who underwent either OL or AL for anterior shoulder instability between 2011 and 2019 was performed. Recurrent instability, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) score, patient satisfaction, willingness to undergo surgery again, and return to work/sport (RTW/RTS) were evaluated. A
resultsOur study included 102 patients in total; 72 patients treated with OL, and 30 treated with AL. There were no demographic differences between the two groups (
conclusionIn patients with anterior shoulder instability, both the OL and AL are reliable treatment options, with a low rate of recurrent instability, and similar patient-reported outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.