Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977625›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2021

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Augmented With Bone Marrow Concentrate, Demineralized Bone Matrix, Autograft Bone, and a Suture Tape (The Fertilized ACL).

Chad Lavender, Vishavpreet Singh, Galen Berdis, William Fravel, Collin Lamba, Tyag Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of an Opioid Avoidance Protocol for ACL Reconstruction: A Pilot Sequential Cohort Study.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chad LavenderMarshall University, Scott Depot, West Virginia, U.S.A.
Vishavpreet SinghMarshall University, Scott Depot, West Virginia, U.S.A.
Galen BerdisMarshall University, Scott Depot, West Virginia, U.S.A.
William FravelMarshall University, Scott Depot, West Virginia, U.S.A.
Collin LambaMarshall University, Scott Depot, West Virginia, U.S.A.
Tyag PatelMarshall University, Scott Depot, West Virginia, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the early clinical outcomes as well as safety of the Fertilized anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedure.

methodsA total of 16 consecutive patients with a mean age of 24 years (range, 16-45 years), who had been treated with the fertilized ACL were evaluated and followed over 2 years. Four patients underwent reconstruction using an FGL GRAFTLINK allograft (LifeNet Virginia Beach, VA) and 12 using quadriceps autografts. All patients received the fertilized ACL as previously described using bone marrow composite, demineralized bone matrix, and an internal brace (Arthrex, Largo, FL). Clinical outcomes at 2 years including International Knee Documentation Committee and Marx scores were evaluated. Complication rates, including return to operating room, arthrofibrosis, infection, and rerupture rates, were also assessed.

resultsAll patients were followed for 6 months and all were released to full activity. In total, 11 of 16 patients were available for 2-year follow-up after the fertilized ACL reconstruction. At 2 years, the average International Knee Documentation Committee and Marx scores were 81 (standard deviation, 5.9) and 9 (standard deviation, 5.7), respectively. One patient required a return trip to the operating room for manipulation under anesthesia. No reruptures were observed at the 2-year mark. Nine of 11 patients had returned to their preinjury activity status at 2 years.

conclusionsThe fertilized ACL, which adds biology and an internal brace to an ACL reconstruction, is a reliable and safe option when performing an ACL reconstruction. Very low complication risks were seen in this consecutive series followed for 2 years. Patients consistently returned to their preinjury activity status. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Identifiers

PMID34977625
PMCPMC8689152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.