Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34977553›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2022

Pharmacists-physicians collaborative intervention to reduce vaccine hesitancy and resistance: A randomized controlled trial.

Derar H Abdel-Qader, Wail Hayajneh, Abdullah Albassam, Nathir M Obeidat, Adel M Belbeisi, Nadia Al Mazrouei, Ala'a F Al-Shaikh, Khaldoon E Nusair, Ahmad Z Al Meslamani, Asma A El-Shara and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Communicating effectively with patients about vaccination: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2023
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Derar H Abdel-QaderFaculty of Pharmacy & Medical Sciences, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan.
Wail HayajnehSchool of Medicine, Saint Louis University, USA.
Abdullah AlbassamDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
Nathir M ObeidatSchool of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Adel M BelbeisiMinistry of Health, Amman, Jordan.
Nadia Al MazroueiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Ala'a F Al-ShaikhMinistry of Health, Amman, Jordan.
Khaldoon E NusairKing Abdullah University Hospital, Jordan.
Ahmad Z Al MeslamaniCollege of Pharmacy, Al Ain University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Asma A El-SharaFaculty of Pharmacy, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan.
Husam El SharuIndiana University Center for Health Innovation and Implementation Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Samah Bahy Mohammed EbaedClinical Pharmacology Depratment, Benha Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.
Osama Mohamed IbrahimDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Egypt.
Ministry of Health · JOAl Ain University · AEBenha University · EGCairo University · EGIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USKing Abdullah University Hospital · JOKuwait University · KWPetra University · JOPhiladelphia University · JOSaint Louis University · USUniversity of Jordan · JOUniversity of Sharjah · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGiven their negative influence on community health, vaccine hesitancy and resistance are emerging challenges that require healthcare intervention. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the impact of physician-pharmacist collaborative health coaching on rates of hesitancy and resistance for a COVID-19 vaccine.

methodsAfter an initial assessment of rates of hesitancy and resistance for a COVID-19 vaccine was conducted, hesitant and resistant participants were approached, recruited, and randomized into an active and control group. Pharmacists-physicians collaborative coaching intervention was delivered to active group subjects over two months through Facebook live sessions. The outcome measures were assessed in both groups before coaching, directly after coaching, and a month after coaching.

resultsThe proportions of hesitancy and resistance for a COVID-19 vaccine among subjects in the active group were significantly reduced from 64.3% and 35.7% before coaching to 20.1% and 7.8% directly after coaching, respectively. These proportions were further reduced to 11.1% and 3.3% a month after coaching, respectively. Furthermore, the mean scores for knowledge on, and attitude towards COVID-19 vaccine were significantly increased from 4.6 ± 1.8 and 4.1 ± 1.7 before coaching to 7.5 ± 3.1 and 8.9 ± 3.8 directly after coaching, respectively. However, the change in mean score of beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines among active group subjects was not significant.

conclusionHigh rates of hesitancy and resistance for a COVID-19 vaccine were found in Jordan. These rates can be significantly reduced through online pharmacists-physicians collaborative coaching, which can also improve knowledge of and attitude towards COVID-19 vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019Health coachingSARS-Cov-2, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2Vaccine hesitancyχ2, chi-square

Identifiers

PMID34977553
PMCPMC8712432
OpenAlexW4200509233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.